ArticleEuropean urology open science2023
Augmentation Uretero-enterocystoplasty Is an Effective Procedure in Protecting the Upper Urinary Tract Without Accelerating Deterioration of Renal Function.
Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Augmentation uretero-enterocystoplasty (AUEC) provides a low-pressure urinary storage capsule that can preserve renal function in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction for whom conservative treatments have failed. Objective: To summarize the effectiveness and safety of augmentation uretero-enterocystoplasty (AUEC) and evaluate whether it aggravates renal function deterioration in patients with renal insufficiency. Design setting and participants: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent AUEC from 2006 to 2021. Patients were grouped according to whether they had normal renal function (NRF) or renal dysfunction (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Follow-up of upper and lower urinary tract function was assessed via review of clinical records, urodynamic data, and laboratory results. Results and limitations: We included 156 patients in the NRF group and 68 in the renal dysfunction group. We confirmed that urodynamic parameters and upper urinary tract dilation were significantly improved for patients after AUEC. Serum creatinine declined during the first 10 mo in both groups and remained stable thereafter. The reduction in serum creatine was significantly greater in the renal dysfunction group than in the NRF group in the first 10 mo (difference in reduction 4.19 units; Conclusions: AUEC is a safe and effective procedure to protect the upper urinary tract and will not hasten deterioration of renal function in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction. In addition, AUEC improved and stabilized residual renal function in patients with renal insufficiency, which is important in preparation for renal transplantation. Patient summary: Bladder dysfunction is usually treated with medication or Botox injections. If these treatments fail, surgery to increase the bladder size using a portion of the patient's intestine is a possible option. Our study shows that this procedure was safe and feasible and improved bladder function. It did not lead to a further decrease in function in patients who already had impaired kidney function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.