ArticleGlobal heart2023
Predictors of Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography.
Article in Global heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Angina Symptom Characteristics and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.The journal of nursing research : JNR · 2025Article
- Multimodality Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease in Latin American Women from IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Collaboratory.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Appropriate patient selection for coronary angiography (CAG) is essential to minimize the unnecessary risk of morbidities and exposure to radiation and iodinated contrast. This becomes even more relevant in low-to-middle-income settings where most health expenditures are out-of-pocket due to lack of medical insurance. We determined predictors of non-obstructive coronaries (NOC) in patients undergoing elective CAG. Methods: CathPCI Registry®, single-center data was extracted for 25,472 patients who had CAG over an eight year period. After excluding patients for compelling conditions or known CAD, 2,984 (11.7%) patients were included in this study. Non-Obstructive Coronaries was defined as <50% left main coronary artery and major epicardial vessel stenosis. Multiple Cox proportional algorithm was employed to report prevalence ratios (PR) of predictors of NOC along with 95% confidence interval. Results: Mean age of patients was 57.9 ± 9.7 years, 23.5% were women. Preprocedural non-invasive testing (NIT) was performed in 46% of the patients; of which 95.5% reported to be positive but only 67.3% were stratified as high risk. Of 2,984 patients undergoing elective CAG, 711 (24%) had NOC. Predictors of NOC included younger age <50 years (PR: 1.3, CI: 1.0-1.5), Women (1.8, 1.5-2.1), low (1.9, 1.5-2.5) and intermediate risk stratification (1.3, 1.0-1.6) on Modified Framingham Risk Score and inappropriate (2.7, 1.6-4.3) and uncertain (1.3, 1.1-1.6) classification of CAG on Appropriate Use Criteria. Patients with heart failure as an indication of CAG (1.7, 1.4-2.0) and No NIT or positive low risk NIT (1.8, 1.5-2.2) were more likely to have NOC. Conclusion: Approximately one out of four patients undergoing elective CAG had NOC. Yield of diagnostic catheterization can be improved by adjudicating NIT especially in younger patients, women, patients with heart failure as an indication of CAG, patients classified as inappropriate on Appropriate Use Criteria and patients categorized as low or intermediate risk on MFRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.