ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for children with acute asthma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Effectiveness of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure in Children with Critical Asthma - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Respiratory Support in Pediatric Critical and Near-Fatal Asthma: A Narrative Review.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Methylprednisolone and Impact on Duration of Noninvasive Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure in Pediatric Severe Asthma Exacerbations.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026Article
- Article
- Status Asthmaticus in the Pediatric ICU: A Comprehensive Review of Management and Challenges.Pediatric reports · 2024Review
- Noninvasive Respiratory Support for Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Respiratory care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) can be effective in children with acute asthma. However, clinical evidence remains limited. The objective of the meta-analysis was to systematically assess NPPV's effectiveness and safety in treating children with acute asthma. Methods: Relevant randomized controlled trials were obtained from electronic resources, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane's Library, Wanfang, and CNKI databases. The influence of potential heterogeneity was taken into account before using a random-effect model to pool the results. Results: A total of 10 RCTs involving 558 children with acute asthma were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to conventional treatment alone, additional use of NPPV significantly improved early blood gas parameters such as the oxygen saturation (mean difference [MD]: 4.28%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51 to 7.04, Conclusions: NPPV in children with acute asthma is associated with improved gas exchange, decreased respiratory rates, a lower symptom score, and a shorter hospital stay. These results suggest that NPPV may be as effective and safe as conventional treatment for pediatric patients with acute asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.