Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37187219›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of pain2023

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Evaluating Delivery Strategies for Pain Coping Skills Training in Women With Breast Cancer.

Yanhong Li, Shelby D Reed, Joseph G Winger, Kelly A Hyland, Hannah M Fisher, Sarah A Kelleher, Shannon N Miller, Marie Davidian, Eric B Laber, Francis J Keefe and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02791646 (Optimizing Delivery of a Behavioral Cancer Pain Intervention Using a SMART), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02791646 nacompletednot on this map

Optimizing Delivery of a Behavioral Cancer Pain Intervention Using a SMART

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2016 to 2021Enrolled327ConditionsPCST-Full (Pain Coping Skills Training), PCST-BriefArmsPain Coping Skills Training Full, Pain Coping Skills Brief
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yanhong LiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Shelby D ReedDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Joseph G WingerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Kelly A HylandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Hannah M FisherDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah A KelleherDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Shannon N MillerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Marie DavidianDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Eric B LaberDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Francis J KeefeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Tamara J SomersDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Optimizing Delivery of a Behavioral Cancer Pain Intervention Using a SMARTR01CA202779 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SOMERS, TAMARA J · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain coping skills training (PCST) is efficacious in patients with cancer, but clinical access is limited. To inform implementation, as a secondary outcome, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of 8 dosing strategies of PCST evaluated in a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial among women with breast cancer and pain (N = 327). Women were randomized to initial doses and re-randomized to subsequent doses based on their initial response (ie, ≥30% pain reduction). A decision-analytic model was designed to incorporate costs and benefits associated with 8 different PCST dosing strategies. In the primary analysis, costs were limited to resources required to deliver PCST. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were modeled based on utility weights measured with the EuroQol-5 dimension 5-level at 4 assessments over 10 months. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to account for parameter uncertainty. Implementation of PCST initiated with the 5-session protocol was more costly ($693-853) than strategies initiated with the 1-session protocol ($288-496). QALYs for strategies beginning with the 5-session protocol were greater than for strategies beginning with the 1-session protocol. With the goal of implementing PCST as part of comprehensive cancer treatment and with willingness-to-pay thresholds ranging beyond $20,000 per QALY, the strategy most likely to provide the greatest number of QALYs at an acceptable cost was a 1-session PCST protocol followed by either 5 maintenance telephone calls for responders or 5 sessions of PCST for nonresponders. A PCST program with 1 initial session and subsequent dosing based on response provides good value and improved outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the results of a cost analysis of the delivery of PCST, a nonpharmacological intervention, to women with breast cancer and pain. Results could potentially provide important cost-related information to health care providers and systems on the use of an efficacious and accessible nonmedication strategy for pain management. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02791646, registered 6/2/2016.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCost-Effectiveness AnalysisAdaptation, PsychologicalFemaleHumansPainPain Managementbehavioral pain managementcancer paincognitive-behavioral therapyCost-effectivenesspain coping skills training

Identifiers

PMID37187219
PMCPMC10524546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.