ArticleZentralblatt fur Chirurgie2023
[The Importance of Feedback in Proctoring in Robotic Surgery - a Cornerstone of the Concept of Success?]
Article in Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and opportunities in the implementation of a new robotic system - a semi-structured interview study with a surgical team.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Implementation of a new robotic system: challenges for the surgical team and ethical concerns about patient safety, a longitudinal questionnaire study.BMJ connections surgery · 2026Article
- Is proctoring in robotic surgery truly helpful? Evaluating general surgeons' perspectives.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- How effective and sustainable is proctoring in robotic surgery? A retrospective analysis based on interviews with surgeons.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Expanding Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology Using the Potential of an Advanced Robotic System.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgical methods are a development and supplement to conventional laparoscopy. Thus, appropriate training of surgeons in this specialty is indispensable. Especially for the initial phase, simulation programs - similar to those used in aviation - are ideally suited to introduce surgeons to the technically challenging surgical procedure. Later on, but still at the beginning of the learning curve, proctoring has proven its worth in order to allow the surgeon to be trained on site, to train him individually and to introduce him to more complex cases. An essential component of successful training concepts is the feedback: after some time and in written form, the surgeon to be trained receives a summary or a guideline, which describes the existing situation as well as suggestions for improvement and future potential. The implementation of such feedback allows the surgeon, in addition to the number of cases completed, to put his self-assessment into perspective and adjust development goals. Thus, feedback is the crucial interface between the beginning of a learning curve and advanced surgical skills, including the possibility of realistic self-assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.