Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37186676›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias

Does Language Distance Modulate the Contribution of Bilingualism to Cognitive Reserve in Seniors? A Systematic Review.

Maria Teresa Carthery-Goulart, Adam John Privitera, Brendan Stuart Weekes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Intervention and Prevention of Dementia in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) of China.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Teresa Carthery-GoulartFaculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-2751-4541
Adam John PriviteraFaculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-8954
Brendan Stuart WeekesFaculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-7933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a systematic review and exploratory meta-regression investigating the hypothesis that the effects of bilingualism on cognitive reserve are modulated by the distance between the pair of languages a bilingual uses. An inclusive multiple database search was performed in order to identify all relevant published research conducted in bilingual seniors. A combination of qualitative and quantitative synthesis methods were used in order to investigate our research questions. Results suggest that healthy bilingual seniors speaking more distant language pairs show improved monitoring performance on cognitive tasks. Evidence regarding a modulatory influence of language distance (LD) on the age of dementia diagnosis was inconclusive due to the small number of published studies meeting our inclusion criteria. We recommend more detailed reporting of individual differences in bilingual experience to assess the impact of LD and other variables on typical cognitive aging and the development of dementia. Linguistic differences in samples should also be considered as a constraint on bilingual advantages in future studies. Preregistration: PROSPERO CRD42021238705; OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/VPRBU.

Indexed as

Cognitive ReserveDementiaMultilingualismHumansLanguageagingAlzheimer’s diseasebilingualismcognitive controlcognitive reservedementiaexecutive functionlanguage distancelanguage similarity

Identifiers

PMID37186676
PMCPMC10623985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.