Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37186588›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Modelling novelty detection in the thalamocortical loop.

Chao Han, Gwendolyn English, Hannes P Saal, Giacomo Indiveri, Aditya Gilra, Wolfger von der Behrens, Eleni Vasilaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Somatosensory Mismatch Negativity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  4. Deviance Distraction and Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Somatosensory Cortex Reduce with Experience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chao HanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-6671
Gwendolyn EnglishInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3417-3511
Hannes P SaalDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7544-0196
Giacomo IndiveriInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-1689
Aditya GilraDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8628-1864
Wolfger von der BehrensInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6883-0236
Eleni VasilakiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3705-7070

Funding

Wellcome Trust 110149/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In complex natural environments, sensory systems are constantly exposed to a large stream of inputs. Novel or rare stimuli, which are often associated with behaviorally important events, are typically processed differently than the steady sensory background, which has less relevance. Neural signatures of such differential processing, commonly referred to as novelty detection, have been identified on the level of EEG recordings as mismatch negativity (MMN) and on the level of single neurons as stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA). Here, we propose a multi-scale recurrent network with synaptic depression to explain how novelty detection can arise in the whisker-related part of the somatosensory thalamocortical loop. The "minimalistic" architecture and dynamics of the model presume that neurons in cortical layer 6 adapt, via synaptic depression, specifically to a frequently presented stimulus, resulting in reduced population activity in the corresponding cortical column when compared with the population activity evoked by a rare stimulus. This difference in population activity is then projected from the cortex to the thalamus and amplified through the interaction between neurons of the primary and reticular nuclei of the thalamus, resulting in rhythmic oscillations. These differentially activated thalamic oscillations are forwarded to cortical layer 4 as a late secondary response that is specific to rare stimuli that violate a particular stimulus pattern. Model results show a strong analogy between this late single neuron activity and EEG-based mismatch negativity in terms of their common sensitivity to presentation context and timescales of response latency, as observed experimentally. Our results indicate that adaptation in L6 can establish the thalamocortical dynamics that produce signatures of SSA and MMN and suggest a mechanistic model of novelty detection that could generalize to other sensory modalities.

Indexed as

NeuronsThalamusSomatosensory Cortex

Identifiers

PMID37186588
PMCPMC10212104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.