ArticleClinical and translational medicine2023
Colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma indicates a meaningful subtype: A whole genome sequencing study.
Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct molecular and tumor microenvironment characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma in colorectal cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- ZNF473 promotes colorectal cancer progression and chemoresistance by destabilizing p53 protein to upregulate Survivin.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in pathological T1-3N0M0 rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: no improvement survival outcomes based on long-term survival analysis of large population data.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Identification and validation of a novel six-gene signature based on mucinous adenocarcinoma-related gene molecular typing in colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Recursive partitioning staging system based on the log odds of the negative lymph node/T stage ratio in colon mucinous adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.