Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37186357›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2023

Interferential therapy for chronic constipation in adults: The CON-COUR randomizedcontrolled trial.

Veronique Vitton, François Mion, Anne-Marie Leroi, Charlène Brochard, Benoit Coffin, Frank Zerbib, Henri Damon, Chloé Melchior, Henri Duboc, Michel Queralto and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02381665 (INTERFERENTIAL THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CONSTIPATION IN ADULTS), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02381665 naunknown statusnot on this map

Interferential therapy in the treatment of chronic constipation in adults: a randomized multi-center trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleRan2015 to 2019Enrolled200ConditionsChronic Constipation SymptomsArmsFlexstim IF, Flexstim IF faked
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Veronique VittonGastroenterology Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-7111
François MionDigestive Physiology Department, Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM U1032, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2908-1591
Anne-Marie LeroiDigestive Physiology Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Charlène BrochardDigestive Physiology Unit, University Hospital of Rennes, University of Rennes 1, CIC 1414, Rennes, France.
Benoit CoffinGastroenterology Department, DMU ESPRIT, Hôpital Louis-Mourier, Colombes, France.
Frank ZerbibGastroenterology Department, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux, France.
Henri DamonDigestive Physiology Department, Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM U1032, Lyon, France.
Chloé MelchiorDigestive Physiology Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-1540
Henri DubocGastroenterology Department, DMU ESPRIT, Hôpital Louis-Mourier, Colombes, France.
Michel QueraltoService de Colo-Proctologie, Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France.
Karine BaumstarckService d'Epidémiologie et Economie en Santé, Direction de la Recherche en Santé, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRADIR Association · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRClinique des Cèdres · FRHôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FRInserm · FRUniversité Rennes 2 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic constipation (CC) is a frequent condition, and the first-line treatment includes dietary rules, the use of laxatives, and biofeedback for evacuation disorders. However, almost half of the patients are dissatisfied with their current treatment. We report the first double-blind randomized multicenter trial assessing the effectiveness of transabdominal electrical stimulation by interferential therapy (IFT) in the treatment of CC in adults.

methodsA prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial was conducted at 7 centers in France. The primary endpoint was 8-week efficacy as defined by the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements during the last 4 weeks of the 8-week stimulation period. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the effects of IFT on symptoms (Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnair (PAC-SYM)), quality of life (QOL) (Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life), Colonic transit time (CTT), anorectal manometry, and patient satisfaction.

resultsThe proportion of 8-week responders was not significantly different between the two groups (73.2% in the IFT group vs. 67.1% in the sham group). After 8 weeks of stimulation, the mean overall PAC-SYM score and the mean reduction in the overall PAC-SYM score were significantly greater in the IFT group than in the sham group. No differences were observed concerning CTT, anorectal manometry, or patient satisfaction.

conclusionsAlthough the primary endpoint was not reached, IFT can significantly alleviate the symptoms and improve the QOL of CC patients. It can be assumed that new treatments require different modes of evaluation and that the assessment of patient-reported outcomes may become a priority among therapeutic targets of CC. Trial registration number NCT02381665.

Indexed as

chronic constipationdouble blindinterferential therapyquality of liferandomized clinical trialtransabdominal electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37186357
PMCPMC10165323
OpenAlexW4367053521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.