ArticlePediatric cardiology2023
Prenatal Congenital Heart Disease-It Takes a Multidisciplinary Village.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current practice and challenges in fetal cardiac intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Heartbeat: a multimodal dataset of fetal echocardiography and clinical metadata for early detection of congenital heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Perinatal Stressors and Consequences for Neonates with Critical Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) allows for thoughtful multidisciplinary planning about location, timing, and need for medical interventions at birth. We sought to assess the accuracy of our prenatal cardiac diagnosis, and postnatal needs for patients with CHD utilizing a multidisciplinary approach. We performed a retrospective chart review of fetal CHD patients between 1/1/18 and 4/30/19. Maternal and infant charts were reviewed for delivery planning, subspecialty care needs, genetic evaluation, prenatal and postnatal cardiac diagnoses, need for prostaglandin (PGE) and neonatal cardiac intervention. 82 maternal-fetal dyads met inclusion criteria during the study period and delivered at a median of 38w2d gestation. 32 (39%) dyads had CHD and other anomalies or genetic abnormalities. All dyads met with a genetic counselor and neonatologist. 11 patients delivered at outside hospitals as planned (all with isolated CHD not requiring neonatal intervention), and 5 chose a palliative delivery. 30 patients were counseled to expect a neonatal cardiac intervention and 25 (83%) underwent an intervention within the expected time period. No neonates required an uncounseled cardiac intervention. 29 patients planned for PGE at birth and 31 received PGE. Of the 79 postnatal echocardiograms, 60 (76%) were entirely consistent with the fetal diagnosis. A multidisciplinary approach to the prenatal diagnosis of CHD in maternal-fetal dyads is optimal and utilizing this method we were able to accurately predict postnatal physiology and ensure that patients delivered in the correct location with an appropriate supportive structure in place.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.