Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37186110›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Cohort study of the mortality among patients in New York City with tuberculosis and COVID-19, March 2020 to June 2022.

Alice V Easton, Marco M Salerno, Lisa Trieu, Erica Humphrey, Fanta Kaba, Michelle Macaraig, Felicia Dworkin, Diana M Nilsen, Joseph Burzynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diverse interactions ofFrontiers in tuberculosis · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alice V EastonBureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4476-9415
Marco M SalernoBureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Lisa TrieuBureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6039-9223
Erica HumphreyBureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Fanta KabaBureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2830-1070
Michelle MacaraigBureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Felicia DworkinBureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4344-8561
Diana M NilsenBureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-6615
Joseph BurzynskiBureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both tuberculosis (TB) and COVID-19 can affect the respiratory system, and early findings suggest co-occurrence of these infectious diseases can result in elevated mortality. A retrospective cohort of patients who were diagnosed with TB and COVID-19 concurrently (within 120 days) between March 2020 and June 2022 in New York City (NYC) was identified. This cohort was compared with a cohort of patients diagnosed with TB-alone during the same period in terms of demographic information, clinical characteristics, and mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare mortality between patient cohorts. One hundred and six patients with concurrent TB/COVID-19 were identified and compared with 902 patients with TB-alone. These two cohorts of patients were largely demographically and clinically similar. However, mortality was higher among patients with concurrent TB/COVID-19 in comparison to patients with TB-alone, even after controlling for age and sex (hazard ratio 2.62, 95% Confidence Interval 1.66-4.13). Nearly one in three (22/70, 31%) patients with concurrent TB/COVID-19 aged 45 and above died during the study period. These results suggest that TB patients with concurrent COVID-19 were at high risk for mortality. It is important that, as a high-risk group, patients with TB are prioritized for resources to quickly diagnose and treat COVID-19, and provided with tools and information to protect themselves from COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID37186110
PMCPMC10132536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.