Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37186080›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Impact of a prenatal screening program on the Down syndrome phenotype: An interrupted time series analysis.

Ellen Hollands Steffensen, Lars Henning Pedersen, Stina Lou, Ida Vogel, Danish Cytogenetic Central Registry Study Group

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen Hollands SteffensenCenter for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0216-9646
Lars Henning PedersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6726-1991
Stina LouCenter for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ida VogelCenter for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Danish Cytogenetic Central Registry Study Group
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

Aarhus University, Faculty of HealthHealth Research Fund of Central Denmark Region A2602Helsefonden 20-B-0065Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF16OC0018772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe hypothesized that children with Down syndrome who were born after the implementation of first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 13, 18, and 21 and a second-trimester ultrasound scan in Denmark would show a milder syndrome phenotype. We investigated the birth biometry, prevalence of congenital malformations, and early childhood morbidity of children with Down syndrome before and after implementation of this screening program. MATERIAL AND

methodsA nationwide register-based study of all live born singletons with Down syndrome in Denmark from 1995 to 2018. In interrupted time series analyses, we studied the temporal developments in birth biometry, prevalence of congenital malformations, and early childhood morbidity related to the implementation of a national prenatal screening program.

resultsWe included 602 singletons with Down syndrome born before and 308 after implementation of the screening program. Z-scores of birthweight and head circumference increased over time before screening, but this temporal development changed after implementation by -0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.11 to 0.01) and -0.05 (95% CI -0.12 to 0.02), respectively. Just after implementation, the prevalence of non-severe congenital heart disease decreased (relative change in odds 0.48 [95% CI: 0.24-0.94]). For severe congenital heart disease, atrioventricular septal defect, and non-heart malformations, this change was 1.16 (95% CI: 0.56-2.41), 0.95 (95% CI: 0.43-2.03), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.33-2.76), respectively. For all malformations, pre-existing temporal developments did not change following implementation of screening. The implementation was associated with higher odds of admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (relative change 1.98 [95% CI: 0.76-5.26]) and an increased risk of hearing impairment (risk difference 3.4% [95% CI: -0.4% to 7.1%]). In contrast, the implementation was not associated with the incidence of hospital admissions by 2 years of age or with the probability of a thyroid disorder.

conclusionsAfter implementation of a national prenatal screening program, we did not observe a milder Down syndrome phenotype apart from an apparent reduction in the proportion of children with non-severe congenital heart disease; this result is, however, limited by small numbers.

Indexed as

Down SyndromePrenatal DiagnosisAdultDenmarkFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfant, NewbornInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMalePregnancyProgram Evaluationanthropometrycongenital abnormalitiescongenital heart defectfirst-trimester combined screeninginterrupted time series analysisphenotypeprenatal ultrasonographytrisomy 21

Identifiers

PMID37186080
PMCPMC10201969
OpenAlexW4367054493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.