Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37186040›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2023

Development and Validation of the Negative Symptom Inventory-Psychosis Risk.

Gregory P Strauss, Elaine F Walker, Andrea Pelletier-Baldelli, Nathan T Carter, Lauren M Ellman, Jason Schiffman, Lauren Luther, Sydney H James, Alysia M Berglund, Tina Gupta and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory P StraussDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Elaine F WalkerDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9798-8101
Andrea Pelletier-BaldelliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3111-5244
Nathan T CarterDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Lauren M EllmanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jason SchiffmanDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California- Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Lauren LutherDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Sydney H JamesDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Alysia M BerglundDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Tina GuptaDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Ivanka RistanovicDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Vijay A MittalDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9017-5119
University of Georgia · USNorthwestern University · USEmory University · USMichigan State University · USTemple University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Prodromal Inventory for Negative Symptoms (PINS): A Development and Validation StudyR01MH116039 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A, STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
1/3-Community Psychosis Risk Screening: An Instrument Development Study SupplementR01MH112613 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ELLMAN, LAUREN M · 2017 to 2022
$1.8M
Administrative Supplement - 3/3: Community Psychology Risk Screening: An Instrument Development StudyR01MH112612 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI PITTS, STEVEN C, SCHIFFMAN, JASON E · 2017 to 2022
$1.3M
2/3 Community psychosis risk screening: An instrument development studyR01MH112545 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112545NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112612NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112613NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesesEarly identification and prevention of psychosis is limited by the availability of tools designed to assess negative symptoms in those at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR). To address this critical need, a multi-site study was established to develop and validate a clinical rating scale designed specifically for individuals at CHR: The Negative Symptom Inventory-Psychosis Risk (NSI-PR). STUDY

designThe measure was developed according to guidelines recommended by the NIMH Consensus Conference on Negative Symptoms using a transparent, iterative, and data-driven process. A 16-item version of the NSI-PR was designed to have an overly inclusive set of items and lengthier interview to support the ultimate intention of creating a new briefer measure. Psychometric properties of the 16-item NSI-PR were evaluated in a sample of 218 CHR participants. STUDY

resultsItem-level analyses indicated that men had higher scores than women. Reliability analyses supported internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Associations with measures of negative symptoms and functioning supported convergent validity. Small correlations with positive, disorganized, and general symptoms supported discriminant validity. Structural analyses indicated a 5-factor structure (anhedonia, avolition, asociality, alogia, and blunted affect). Item response theory identified items for removal and indicated that the anchor range could be reduced. Factor loadings, item-level correlations, item-total correlations, and skew further supported removal of certain items.

conclusionsThese findings support the psychometric properties of the NSI-PR and guided the creation of a new 11-item NSI-PR that will be validated in the next phase of this multi-site scale development project.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaAnhedoniaFemaleHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsclinical interviewclinical trialearly identificationpreventionprodromerating scale

Identifiers

PMID37186040
PMCPMC10483448
OpenAlexW4366976471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.