ArticleScientific reports2023
Deep learning-based automated detection and multiclass classification of focal interictal epileptiform discharges in scalp electroencephalograms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conditional spatial classification of expert-confirmed interictal epileptiform discharge epochs: An EEG-ECG ablation and SHAP analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for automated detection of interictal epileptiform discharges: methodological progress, clinical evaluation, and neurodevelopmental context.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Optimizing electroencephalogram duration for efficient detection of epileptiform abnormalities in diverse patient groups: a retrospective study.BMC neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection and spatial distribution analyses of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are important for diagnosing, classifying, and treating focal epilepsy. This study proposes deep learning-based models to detect focal IEDs in electroencephalography (EEG) recordings of the frontal, temporal, and occipital scalp regions. This study included 38 patients with frontal (n = 15), temporal (n = 13), and occipital (n = 10) IEDs and 232 controls without IEDs from a single tertiary center. All the EEG recordings were segmented into 1.5-s epochs and fed into 1- or 2-dimensional convolutional neural networks to construct binary classification models to detect IEDs in each focal region and multiclass classification models to categorize IEDs into frontal, temporal, and occipital regions. The binary classification models exhibited accuracies of 79.3-86.4%, 93.3-94.2%, and 95.5-97.2% for frontal, temporal, and occipital IEDs, respectively. The three- and four-class models exhibited accuracies of 87.0-88.7% and 74.6-74.9%, respectively, with temporal, occipital, and non-IEDs F1-scores of 89.9-92.3%, 84.9-90.6%, and 84.3-86.0%; and 86.6-86.7%, 86.8-87.2%, and 67.8-69.2% for the three- and four-class (frontal, 50.3-58.2%) models, respectively. The deep learning-based models could help enhance EEG interpretation. Although they performed well, the resolution of region-specific focal IED misinterpretations and further model improvement are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.