Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37185941›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Deep learning-based automated detection and multiclass classification of focal interictal epileptiform discharges in scalp electroencephalograms.

Yoon Gi Chung, Woo-Jin Lee, Sung Min Na, Hunmin Kim, Hee Hwang, Chang-Ho Yun, Ki Joong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoon Gi Chung *Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Woo-Jin Lee *Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Sung Min NaDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Hunmin KimDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea. hunminkim@snubh.org.
Hee HwangDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Ho YunDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Ki Joong KimDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection and spatial distribution analyses of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are important for diagnosing, classifying, and treating focal epilepsy. This study proposes deep learning-based models to detect focal IEDs in electroencephalography (EEG) recordings of the frontal, temporal, and occipital scalp regions. This study included 38 patients with frontal (n = 15), temporal (n = 13), and occipital (n = 10) IEDs and 232 controls without IEDs from a single tertiary center. All the EEG recordings were segmented into 1.5-s epochs and fed into 1- or 2-dimensional convolutional neural networks to construct binary classification models to detect IEDs in each focal region and multiclass classification models to categorize IEDs into frontal, temporal, and occipital regions. The binary classification models exhibited accuracies of 79.3-86.4%, 93.3-94.2%, and 95.5-97.2% for frontal, temporal, and occipital IEDs, respectively. The three- and four-class models exhibited accuracies of 87.0-88.7% and 74.6-74.9%, respectively, with temporal, occipital, and non-IEDs F1-scores of 89.9-92.3%, 84.9-90.6%, and 84.3-86.0%; and 86.6-86.7%, 86.8-87.2%, and 67.8-69.2% for the three- and four-class (frontal, 50.3-58.2%) models, respectively. The deep learning-based models could help enhance EEG interpretation. Although they performed well, the resolution of region-specific focal IED misinterpretations and further model improvement are needed.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEpilepsies, PartialEpilepsyElectroencephalographyHumansScalp

Identifiers

PMID37185941
PMCPMC10130023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.