ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2024
Can dynamic elastic therapy be established as the standard protocol of closed reduction for moderately displaced extracapsular condylar fractures?
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was conducted with the aim to establish standard technique of closed reduction (CR) and compare functional outcomes in patients of moderately displaced unilateral extracapsular condylar fractures. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study is a retrospective randomized controlled trial, conducted at a tertiary care hospital setting from August, 2013 to November, 2018. Patients of unilateral extracapsular condylar fractures with ramus shortening < 7mm and deviation < 35° were divided in two groups by drawing lots and were treated by dynamic elastic therapy and maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). Mean and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables, and one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson's Chi-square test were used to determine significance of outcomes between two modalities of CR. P value < 0.05 was taken as significant.
resultsThe numbers of patients treated by dynamic elastic therapy and MMF were 76 (38 in each group). Out of which 48 (63.15%) were male and 28 (36.84%) were female. The ratio of male to female was 1.7:1. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of age was 32 ± 9.57 years. In patients treated by dynamic elastic therapy, the mean ± SD (at 6-month follow-up) of loss of ramus height (LRH), maximum incisal opening (MIO) and opening deviation were 4.6mm ± 1.08mm, 40.4mm ± 1.57mm and 1.1mm ± 0.87mm respectively. Whereas, LRH, MIO and opening deviation were 4.6mm ± 0.85mm, 40.4mm ± 2.37mm and 0.8mm ± 0.63mm respectively by MMF therapy. One-way ANOVA was statistically insignificant (P value > 0.05) for above mentioned outcomes. Pre-traumatic occlusion was achieved in 89.47% of patients by MMF and in 86.84% patients by dynamic elastic therapy. Pearson's Chi-square test was statistically insignificant (p value < 0.05) for occlusion.
conclusionParallel results were obtained for both modalities; thus, the technique as dynamic elastic therapy, which promotes early mobilization and functional rehabilitation, can be favored as standard technique of closed reduction for moderately displaced extracapsular condylar fractures. This technique eases patients' stress associated with MMF and prevents ankylosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.