ArticleScientific reports2023
False-positive classification and associated factors in segmented macular layers and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: Spectralis OCT deviation map study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluating Ocular Hypertensive and Glaucoma Suspect Eyes: Real-World Data from Taiwan.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of epiretinal membrane using spectralis OCT in Fujian Eye Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Normative Data for Inner Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters in a Cohort of Egyptian Population.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rates, patterns and associated factors for false-positive classification of deviation maps by Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT) have been reported. However, research on OCT layer-by-layer deviation maps is lacking. We aimed to determine the rates and associated factors for false-positive classification of segmented macular layers and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) deviation maps of Spectralis OCT, and to identify false-positive patterns on segmented macular layers deviation maps. 118 healthy eyes of 118 normal participants who had undergone Spectralis OCT imaging were included. False-positive classification was determined by the area and location of yellow or red color-coded regions on the deviation map. The false-positive rates on the deviation maps were the highest on the ganglion cell layer map, followed by the inner plexiform layer, retinal layer, and RNFL maps. More myopic/less hyperopic refractive error was a factor significantly associated with higher false-positive classification on the RNFL deviation map, and three false-positive patterns were found on the segmented macular layers deviation maps. Spectralis OCT deviation maps should be interpreted carefully to avoid misdiagnosis, especially for eyes with higher degrees of myopic refractive error on the RNFL map, for which purpose, recognizing the characteristic false-positive patterns would be helpful in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.