ReviewBiosensors2023
Recent Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Optical Sensors for Detection of Pesticide Residues in Soil.
Review in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming soil decontamination: the role and prospects of nanotechnological remediation.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Recycling Ag SERS-substrates from strongly chemisorbing molecules.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Development of Advanced Nanobiosensors and a Portable Monitoring System for Pesticide Detection at the Point of Need.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Mango peels-assisted synthesis of carbon quantum dots for potential optical sensing of diazinon.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Harnessing Maillard reaction byproducts for dual emissive carbon quantum dots: a tunable optical platform.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Revisiting the Role of Sensors for Shaping Plant Research: Applications and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- CoMnOBiosensors · 2024Article
- Direct and indirect technical guide for the early detection and management of fungal plant diseases.Current research in microbial sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The excessive and unreasonable use of pesticides has adversely affected the environment and human health. The soil, one of the most critical natural resources supporting human survival and development, accumulates large amounts of pesticide residues. Compared to traditional spectrophotometry analytical methods, nanoparticle-based sensors stand out for their simplicity of operation as well as their high sensitivity and low detection limits. In this review, we focus primarily on the functions that various nanoparticles have and how they can be used to detect various pesticide residues in soil. A detailed discussion was conducted on the properties of nanoparticles, including their color changeability, Raman enhancement, fluorescence enhancement and quenching, and catalysis. We have also systematically reviewed the methodology for detecting insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides in soil by using nanoparticles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.