Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37185299›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

Lessons learnt from a scientific peer-review training programme designed to support research capacity and professional development in a global community.

Julie M Buser, Kirby L Morris, Veronica Millicent Dzomeku, Tamrat Endale, Yolanda R Smith, Ella August

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. ThemBio · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie M BuserCenter for International Reproductive Health Training at the University of Michigan (CIRHT-UM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kirby L MorrisSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Veronica Millicent DzomekuDepartment of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Tamrat EndaleCenter for International Reproductive Health Training at the University of Michigan (CIRHT-UM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Yolanda R SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ella AugustSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA eaugust@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5151-1036

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
NIH HHS P51 OD011132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality peer-reviewer training open to researchers across the globe has the potential to improve the published literature, however, this type of training is not widely available. In this paper, we describe an online peer-reviewer training programme, highlight its effectiveness in building peer review and writing skills, and discuss challenges and lessons learnt. This training programme, open to researchers across the globe, acquaints participants with challenges to and inequities in publishing and educates them about writing effective peer reviews. A focal point is how to provide specific and respectful feedback to help authors get accepted for peer review at an academic journal. Forty-nine participants from or residing in six continents completed the training. All programme evaluation respondents agreed that the orientation helped them gain a better understanding of their role as a peer reviewer at Pre-Publication Support Service. Most agreed that the training was helpful in improving their peer-review skills, and that the training was helpful in improving their writing skills. Participants wanted more networking and collaboration opportunities with other peer reviewers, inclusion of a qualitatively researched example paper and improved communication about the required time commitment. Our online programme with multiple time options was geographically inclusive but internet connectivity was challenging for some participants. Peer-reviewer training programmes can help researchers build their peer review and writing skills and enhance participants' understanding of disparities in publishing. Integrating a geographically diverse group of researchers has the potential to enrich the discussions and learning in such a programme.

Indexed as

Peer ReviewWritingHumansProgram Evaluationpublic health

Identifiers

PMID37185299
PMCPMC10151889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.