Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37185186›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the UK: a mixed-methods study.

Adam Jonathan Boulton, Anne-Marie Slowther, Joyce Yeung, Christopher Bassford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Beyond the pilot analogy.Critical care (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam Jonathan BoultonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK adam.boulton@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-2115-1129
Anne-Marie SlowtherWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Joyce YeungWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2950-4758
Christopher BassfordWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the experience of moral distress among intensive care unit (ICU) professionals in the UK.

designMixed methods: validated quantitative measure of moral distress followed by purposive sample of respondents who underwent semistructured interviews.

settingFour ICUs of varying sizes and specialty facilities.

participantsHealthcare professionals working in ICU.

results227 questionnaires were returned and 15 interviews performed. Moral distress occurred across all ICUs and professional demographics. It was most commonly related to providing care perceived as futile or against the patient's wishes/interests, followed by resource constraints compromising care. Moral distress score was independently influenced by profession (p=0.02) (nurses 117.0 vs doctors 78.0). A lack of agency was central to moral distress and its negative experience could lead to withdrawal from engaging with patients/families. One-third indicated their intention to leave their current post due to moral distress and this was greater among nurses than doctors (37.0% vs 15.0%). Moral distress was independently associated with an intention to leave their current post (p<0.0001) and a previous post (p=0.001). Participants described a range of individualised coping strategies tailored to the situations faced. The most common and highly valued strategies were informal and relied on working within a supportive environment along with a close-knit team, although participants acknowledged there was a role for structured and formalised intervention.

conclusionsMoral distress is widespread among UK ICU professionals and can have an important negative impact on patient care, professional wellbeing and staff retention, a particularly concerning finding as this study was performed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Moral distress due to resource-related issues is more severe than comparable studies in North America. Interventions to support professionals should recognise the individualistic nature of coping with moral distress. The value of close-knit teams and supportive environments has implications for how intensive care services are organised.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19HumansIntensive Care UnitsJob SatisfactionMoralsPandemicsStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomAdult intensive & critical careETHICS (see Medical Ethics)INTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE

Identifiers

PMID37185186
PMCPMC10151959
OpenAlexW4366983465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.