Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37185115›Full record

ArticleRespiratory care2023

Barriers to Respiratory Care Research in the United States.

L Denise Willis, Jacob Rintz, Marco Zaccagnini, Andrew G Miller, Jie Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2025
    Article
  4. Establishing research priorities for the Respiratory Therapy profession in Canada: A modified Delphi study.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2025
    Article
  5. Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of evidence-informed practice in respiratory therapy: A cross-sectional survey.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The scholarly and practice profile of respiratory therapists in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2024
    Article
  11. Exploring knowledge gaps and research needs in respiratory therapy: a qualitative description study.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

L Denise WillisRespiratory Care Services, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Jacob RintzDepartment Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
Marco ZaccagniniDepartment of Respiratory Therapy, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; and School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Andrew G MillerRespiratory Care Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jie LiDepartment Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois. Jie_Li@rush.edu.
Rush University Medical Center · USArkansas Children's Hospital · USDuke University · USMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory therapists (RTs) are in a unique position to positively impact patient outcomes through respiratory care research. Research plays a key role in evidence-based medicine; however, few RTs perform and publish research. Identification of barriers experienced by RTs may help increase RT-driven research. Thus, we aimed to identify barriers and research interests for RTs.

methodsAmerican Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) members were invited to anonymously complete a survey via an electronic link posted on AARC Connect. Survey domains included research training, experience, reasons for doing research, important respiratory topics, and barriers to conduct research.

resultsResponses from 82 surveys were analyzed. The majority were female (56%), and most had a graduate degree (61%), with a mean working experience of 25.3 ± 13.6 y. Fifty-seven percent of respondents reported at least one publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The desire to improve patient outcomes was the top-ranked reason for doing research. Most received research training through a graduate-level program (56%), but few had a formal research mentor (26%). Clinical research (67%) and quality improvement (63%) were the most common types of research. Data collection was the most common research role (51%). Invasive ventilation, advanced monitoring, and airway clearance were identified as the most important research topics. The primary barriers for RTs to conduct research were lack of protected time for research, opportunities to participate, training, departmental support, and mentorship.

conclusionsLack of time, resources, and opportunities were identified as the primary barriers to RT research, and many RTs have not received formal research training. Resources such as formal mentorship, funding, and protected time may help increase RT participation in research.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelRespiratory TherapyFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesbarriersevidence-based practiceresearchrespiratory carerespiratory therapist

Identifiers

PMID37185115
PMCPMC10353173
OpenAlexW4366984129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.