Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37185012›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography

Feasibility of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Microarchitecture Assessment Using Deep Learning With a Convolutional Neural Network.

Kazuki Yoshida, Yuki Tanabe, Hikaru Nishiyama, Takuya Matsuda, Hidetaka Toritani, Takuya Kitamura, Shinichiro Sakai, Kunihiko Watamori, Masaki Takao, Eizen Kimura and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kazuki YoshidaFrom the Departments of Radiology.
Yuki TanabeFrom the Departments of Radiology.
Hikaru NishiyamaFrom the Departments of Radiology.
Takuya MatsudaMedical Informatics.
Hidetaka ToritaniEhime University School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon City, Japan.
Takuya KitamuraFrom the Departments of Radiology.
Shinichiro SakaiOrthopedic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine.
Kunihiko WatamoriOrthopedic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine.
Masaki TakaoOrthopedic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine.
Eizen KimuraMedical Informatics.
Teruhito KidoFrom the Departments of Radiology.
Ehime University · JPInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biostatistics · CH

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe evaluated the feasibility of using deep learning with a convolutional neural network for predicting bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microarchitecture from conventional computed tomography (CT) images acquired by multivendor scanners.

methodsWe enrolled 402 patients who underwent noncontrast CT examinations, including L1-L4 vertebrae, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination. Among these, 280 patients (3360 sagittal vertebral images), 70 patients (280 sagittal vertebral images), and 52 patients (208 sagittal vertebral images) were assigned to the training data set for deep learning model development, the validation, and the test data set, respectively. Bone mineral density and the trabecular bone score (TBS), an index of bone microarchitecture, were assessed by DXA. BMDDL and TBSDL were predicted by deep learning with a convolutional neural network (ResNet50). Pearson correlation tests assessed the correlation between BMDDL and BMD, and TBSDL and TBS. The diagnostic performance of BMDDL for osteopenia/osteoporosis and that of TBSDL for bone microarchitecture impairment were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

resultsBMDDL and BMD correlated strongly (r = 0.81, P < 0.01), whereas TBSDL and TBS correlated moderately (r = 0.54, P < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of BMDDL for identifying osteopenia or osteoporosis were 93% and 90%, and 100% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of TBSDL for identifying patients with bone microarchitecture impairment were 73% for all values.

conclusionsThe BMDDL and TBSDL derived from conventional CT images could identify patients who should undergo DXA, which could be a gatekeeper tool for detecting latent osteoporosis/osteopenia or bone microarchitecture impairment.

Indexed as

Bone Diseases, MetabolicDeep LearningOsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityFeasibility StudiesHumansLumbar Vertebrae

Identifiers

PMID37185012
PMCPMC10184800
OpenAlexW4376619916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.