Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37184955›Full record

ArticleEndocrine-related cancer2023

Expert Consensus Practice Recommendations of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society for the management of high grade gastroenteropancreatic and gynecologic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Jennifer R Eads, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Tim Asmis, Andrew M Bellizzi, Emily K Bergsland, Arvind Dasari, Ghassan El-Haddad, Michael Frumovitz, Joshua Meyer, Erik Mittra and 7 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine-related cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jennifer R EadsDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0491-4518
Thorvardur R HalfdanarsonDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8460-1257
Tim AsmisDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew M BellizziDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Emily K BergslandDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7754-6552
Arvind DasariDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5271-9744
Ghassan El-HaddadDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Michael FrumovitzDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Joshua MeyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Erik MittraDivision of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Sten MyrehaugDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5765-1969
Eric NakakuraDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Nitya RajDepartment of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Heloisa P SoaresDivision of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5185-2583
Brian UntchDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8379-5691
Namrata VijayvergiaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jennifer A ChanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsConsensusFemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingNorth Americahigh-gradeneuroendocrine carcinomaneuroendocrine tumorsrecommendations

Identifiers

PMID37184955
PMCPMC10388681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.