Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37184914›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Screening for Media Use in the Emergency Department Among Young Australians: Cross-sectional Study.

Pravin Dullur, Joanne Joseph, Antonio Mendoza Diaz, Ping-I Lin, Rajeev Jairam, Rhian Davies, Anne Masi, Boaz Shulruf, Valsamma Eapen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pravin Dullur *Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-3681
Joanne Joseph *Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7781-2742
Antonio Mendoza DiazDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-7601
Ping-I LinDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-7184
Rajeev JairamDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-6446
Rhian DaviesInfant, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, South Western Sydney Local Health District Liverpool, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0694-8934
Anne MasiDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3135-6961
Boaz ShulrufMedical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-727X
Valsamma EapenDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-8306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on problematic internet use has largely adhered to addiction paradigms, possibly impeding the identification of specific internet behaviors related to psychopathology. This study presents a novel approach to screening for specific problematic internet behaviors by using a new measure, the emergency department media use screener (EDMUS).

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify patterns of internet use in young people presenting with mental health concerns to the emergency department (ED), ascertain associations with their mental health, and evaluate whether the EDMUS can be used to predict subsequent ED presentations within 3 months.

methodsThis cross-sectional retrospective study of Australian young people (N=149, aged 11-25 years; female: n=92, 61.7%) sought to use the EDMUS, a 24-item questionnaire, to identify problematic internet behaviors, including accessing or posting prosuicidal or proeating disorder content, cyberbullying, and inappropriate digital content. Data on each person's mental health were extracted from electronic medical records to look for associations with EDMUS responses and ED re-presentation over 3 months. EDMUS items were grouped into clusters for analysis using chi-square tests, binary logistic regression, and path analyses.

resultsSharing suicidal digital content was the most common problematic internet use pattern identified by the EDMUS. However, this did not correlate with having a prior mental health diagnosis or predict readmission. Most participants had families with a concern for their internet use; however, this was less likely in participants with a diagnosis of personality disorder. Diagnoses of personality disorder or posttraumatic stress disorder were independent predictors of readmission (P=.003; P=.048).

conclusionsAlthough a history of complex psychopathology increases the likelihood of subsequent ED presentations, its links to internet use-related behaviors are still unclear. The EDMUS has potential for identifying young people who are most vulnerable to problematic internet behaviors and offers the opportunity for early intervention and potential prevention of more entrenched difficulties.

Indexed as

adolescentemergency departmentinternetinternet behaviorinternet usemental healthmental illnessoveruseproblematic internet behaviorsscreeningtechnology useyoung peopleyouth

Identifiers

PMID37184914
PMCPMC10227703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.