Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37184902›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Using Digital Tools to Study the Health of Adults Born Preterm at a Large Scale: e-Cohort Pilot Study.

Elsa Lorthe, Carolina Santos, José Pedro Ornelas, Julia Nadine Doetsch, Sandra C S Marques, Raquel Teixeira, Ana Cristina Santos, Carina Rodrigues, Gonçalo Gonçalves, Pedro Ferreira Sousa and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elsa LortheEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9654-8104
Carolina SantosEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7949-7819
José Pedro OrnelasInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3309-5160
Julia Nadine DoetschEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1388-9542
Sandra C S MarquesEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4169-2624
Raquel TeixeiraEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1942-8317
Ana Cristina SantosEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2992-5299
Carina RodriguesEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1720-2808
Gonçalo GonçalvesInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3849-9065
Pedro Ferreira SousaInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3184-6047
João Correia LopesInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9040-0889
Artur RochaInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5637-1041
Henrique BarrosEPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4699-6571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth is a global health concern. Its adverse consequences may persist throughout the life course, exerting a potentially heavy burden on families, health systems, and societies. In high-income countries, the first children who benefited from improved care are now adults entering middle age. However, there is a clear gap in the knowledge regarding the long-term outcomes of individuals born preterm.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the feasibility of recruiting and following up an e-cohort of adults born preterm worldwide and provide estimations of participation, characteristics of participants, the acceptability of questions, and the quality of data collected.

methodsWe implemented a prospective, open, observational, and international e-cohort pilot study (Health of Adult People Born Preterm-an e-Cohort Pilot Study [HAPP-e]). Inclusion criteria were being an adult (aged ≥18 years), born preterm (<37 weeks of gestation), having internet access and an email address, and understanding at least 1 of the available languages. A large, multifaceted, and multilingual communication strategy was established. Between December 2019 and June 2021, inclusion and repeated data collection were performed using a secured web platform. We provided descriptive statistics regarding participation in the e-cohort, namely, the number of persons who registered on the platform, signed the consent form, initiated and completed the baseline questionnaire, and initiated and completed the follow-up questionnaire. We also described the main characteristics of the HAPP-e participants and provided an assessment of the quality of the data and the acceptability of sensitive questions.

resultsAs of December 31, 2020, a total of 1004 persons had registered on the platform, leading to 527 accounts with a confirmed email and 333 signed consent forms. A total of 333 participants initiated the baseline questionnaire. All participants were invited to follow-up, and 35.7% (119/333) consented to participate, of whom 97.5% (116/119) initiated the follow-up questionnaire. Completion rates were very high both at baseline (296/333, 88.9%) and at follow-up (112/116, 96.6%). This sample of adults born preterm in 34 countries covered a wide range of sociodemographic and health characteristics. The gestational age at birth ranged from 23+6 to 36+6 weeks (median 32, IQR 29-35 weeks). Only 2.1% (7/333) of the participants had previously participated in a cohort of individuals born preterm. Women (252/333, 75.7%) and highly educated participants (235/327, 71.9%) were also overrepresented. Good quality data were collected thanks to validation controls implemented on the web platform. The acceptability of potentially sensitive questions was excellent, as very few participants chose the "I prefer not to say" option when available.

conclusionsAlthough we identified room for improvement in specific procedures, this pilot study confirmed the great potential for recruiting a large and diverse sample of adults born preterm worldwide, thereby advancing research on adults born preterm.

Indexed as

Premature BirthAdolescentAdultChildFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedParturitionPilot ProjectsPregnancyProspective Studiescitizen sciencecohort studye-cohortepidemiologyglobal burdenglobal healthhealth outcomelife course epidemiologymobile phoneobservational studyparticipant involvementprematureprematuritypretermpreterm birthquestionnaireRECAP PretermResearch on European Children and Adults born Pretermsurvey

Identifiers

PMID37184902
PMCPMC10227705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.