ArticleJAMA network open2023
Population-Based Characterization of Menstrual Migraine and Proposed Diagnostic Criteria.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06659120 (Fremanezumab for the Prevention of Menstrually-related Migraine Attacks - a Prospective, Observational Study According to Routine Neurological Care in Switzerland), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Fremanezumab for the Prevention of Menstrually-related Migraine Attacks - a Prospective, Observational Study According to Routine Neurological Care in Switzerland
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Evolving Definition of Underserved Populations in Headache Medicine.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Clinical characteristics of pure menstrual migraine and menstrually-related migraine: a cross-sectional online questionnaire study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Benchmark evaluation of large language models for clinical decision support in headache management.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- From nighttime light exposure to menstrual health: a critical review of evidence, mechanisms, and nursing interventions.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Mechanistic approach and therapeutic strategies in menstrual and non-menstrual migraine.Future science OA · 2025Review
- Clinical characteristics and social burden of menstrual migraine in Japan: an online-based cross-sectional questionnaire study.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Underdiagnosis and impact of menstrual migraine in real-world clinical practice: A real-world survey.Headache · 2025Article
- Targeting PACAP: Beyond Migraine to Cluster, Menstrual, and Post-traumatic Headaches.Advances in therapy · 2025Review
- Relationship of Reduced Pain Intensity and Improved Quality-of-Life with Menstrual Migraine with Aspirin, Acetaminophen, and Caffeine Combination.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cycling sensitivity across migraine phases: A longitudinal case-control study.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Article
- How Sex Hormones Affect Migraine: An Interdisciplinary Preclinical Research Panel Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Study to Determine the Prevalence of Menstrual Migraine in Reproductive-Age Women in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Understanding migraine throughout a woman's life and the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide: A narrative review.Women's health (London, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: There is a need for better recognition and more extensive research into menstrual migraine (MM) in the general population, and a revision of the diagnostic criteria for MM is warranted to move the field forward. Increased understanding of MM is crucial for improving clinical care, diagnosis, and therapy for MM. Objectives: To assess the clinical characteristics of MM, including severity and treatment response, and to propose new diagnostic criteria for pure MM and menstrually related migraine. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a case-control study of Danish individuals with migraine. All individuals completed a 105-item validated diagnostic migraine questionnaire, sent via the Danish electronic mailing system (e-Boks) between May and August 2020, allowing diagnosis of pure MM and menstrually related migraine by the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (ICHD-3). Data analysis was performed from September 2021 to November 2022. Exposure: Diagnosis of migraine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical characteristics of women with MM and women with nonmenstrual migraine (non-MM) were compared using the ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria. A simulation of the risk of randomly misclassifying MM was based on number of migraine attacks during 3 menstrual cycles (3 × 28 days), and simulation analyses were performed using 100 000 permutations of random migraine attacks in migraine patients. Results: A total of 12 618 individuals, including 9184 women, with migraine participated in the study. Among the women with migraine, the prevalence of MM was 16.6% (1532 women), and the prevalence of non-MM was 45.9% (4216 women). The mean (SD) age was 38.7 (8.7) years for women with MM and 37.0 (9.2) years for women with non-MM. Of the 1532 women with MM, 410 (26.8%) fulfilled ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria for pure MM, 1037 (67.7%) fulfilled ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria for menstrually related migraine, and 152 (9.9%) fulfilled proposed diagnostic criteria for rare pure MM. MM was associated with a higher frequency of migraine-accompanying symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.71-2.29), more frequent (OR, 7.21; 95% CI, 5.77-9.03) and more severe (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13-1.21) migraine attacks, lower frequency of nonmigraine headache (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18-0.49), an overall greater response to treatment with triptans (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.24-2.24), better improvement of migraine attacks during late pregnancy (OR, 5.10; 95% CI, 2.17-14.00), and faster reappearance of migraine attacks post partum (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.40-4.25). Hormonal contraceptive-related MM was associated with a higher prevalence of migraine without aura than migraine related to spontaneous menstruation (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.62-2.06). Otherwise, no differences between hormonal and spontaneous MM were observed. The risk of random diagnostic misclassification of ICHD-3 menstrually related migraine in women with high frequency episodic migraine was 43%. This risk was reduced to 3% when applying the proposed criteria for menstrually related migraine. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study, MM in the general population had clinical characteristics that were quantitively different from those of non-MM. Detailed descriptive data and suggested improved diagnostic criteria for pure MM and menstrually related migraine were provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.