Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37184822›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health economics and management2023

Finding fraud: enforcement, detection, and recoveries after the ACA.

Victoria Perez, Julio A Ramos Pastrana

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health economics and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria PerezYale School of Public Health, New Haven, USA. victoria.perez@yale.edu.
Julio A Ramos PastranaPenn State University, State College, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USYale New Haven Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicaid Fraud Control Units investigate and prosecute acts of financial fraud and patient abuse within the program. Prior to the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), federal government MFCU expenditures totaled half a percent of Medicaid expenditures. Following the enrollment of 12 million adults into the Medicaid program under the ACA, expenditures for these units are now less than pre-ACA levels, as a share of program expenses. We use data for states' fraud enforcement efforts in the period 2010-2018 and a difference-in-differences design that exploits states' decision to expand Medicaid under the ACA. States that did expand Medicaid increased their fraud investigations, compared to states that did not expand. Further, civil recoveries and excluded individuals increased after the Medicaid expansion. We find evidence that increases in program scale, in terms of enrollment and utilization, reverted to the mean, facilitating the identification of outlier provider behavior.

Indexed as

MedicaidPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActAdultHealth ExpendituresHumansUnited StatesAffordable care actFraudHealthcareMedicaid

Identifiers

PMID37184822
OpenAlexW4376618515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.