Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37184808›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2024

The role of Mathematical Semiotic Signs in Enhancing Working Memory and Inhibition as the Components of Executive Functions.

Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Jiehui Hu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omid Khatin-ZadehSchool of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. khatinzadeh.omid@yahoo.com.
Jiehui HuSchool of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we draw on Charles Sanders Pierce's typology of semiotic signs and suggest that the three types of signs (icon, index, and symbol) enhance working memory and inhibition through three different mechanisms: icons support the process of embodiment; indexes strengthen focus of attention; symbols enhance the process of generalization. Mathematical icons enhance the process of embodying mathematical entities. They help the individual hold the information associated with a mathematical entity in the visual working memory and suppress information that is irrelevant to the task. Indexes strengthen focus of attention by directly referring to the place of mathematical entities and disregarding contextually-irrelevant stimuli. Symbols enhance the process of generalization by suppressing low-level information and reducing the load on working memory. Since cognitive flexibility as the third component of executive functions builds on working memory and inhibition, it can be hypothesized that mathematical signs contribute to this component as well.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionMemory, Short-TermAttentionHumansExecutive functionsInhibitionMathematical signsWorking memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.