Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37184734›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2023

English Grammar Skills in Dutch Grade 4 Children: Examining the Relation Between L1 and L2 Language Skills.

Margreet van Koert, Nihayra Leona, Judith Rispens, Jurgen Tijms, Maurits van der Molen, Hernán Labbé Grunberg, Patrick Snellings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margreet van KoertUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nihayra LeonaUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith RispensUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J.E.Rispens@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4489-9797
Jurgen TijmsUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maurits van der MolenUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hernán Labbé GrunbergUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick SnellingsUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

NRO NRO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Second language proficiency may be related to first language acquisition (Ganschow & Sparks, 1991), but relatively little is known about the relation between first and second language grammatical proficiency in primary school children who are in their first stages of foreign language learning. This study aims to determine whether differences in Dutch and English vocabulary and Dutch grammar skills predict differences in English grammatical proficiency in Dutch speaking children who are in grade 4 in primary school. The selected participants are monolingual Dutch pupils (N = 152), aged 9;0-10;0. To measure the children's vocabulary the PPVT was used in Dutch (Schlichting, 2005) and in English (Dunn & Dunn, 2007). In addition, two grammar tasks in English and one in Dutch of the CELF (Semel et al., 2003) were used. The results show that English vocabulary is a strong predictor of English grammar skills, and that the Dutch vocabulary skills are weaker predictors of English grammar skills. Moreover, Dutch grammar skills predict English grammar skills for one of the grammar tasks. These results are discussed vis-à-vis hypotheses about cross-domain transfer and cross-linguistic transfer (Blom et al., 2012; Cummins, 1979; Ganschow & Sparks, 1991; Paradis, 2011; Sparks, 1995).

Indexed as

MultilingualismChildHumansLanguageLanguage DevelopmentLinguisticsVocabularyLinguistic transferRelation between grammar and vocabularySecond language learning

Identifiers

PMID37184734
PMCPMC10520197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.