ReviewHead and neck pathology2023
Proceedings of the North American Society of Head and Neck Pathology Companion Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March 12, 2023: Oral Cavity Dysplasia: Why Does Histologic Grading Continue to be Contentious?
Review in Head and neck pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discrepancies with Final Diagnosis in Head and Neck Intraoperative Frozen Section.Head and neck pathology · 2026Article
- Insights into incipient oral squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive south-american study.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the world's 6th most common malignancy. Oral cavity SCC (OCSCC) represents approximately one third of the HNSCC cases diagnosed annually in the United States. Despite therapeutic advances, OCSCC is frequently lethal, with a modest 5-year survival. Because OCSCC is often preceded by premalignant lesions, it is an ideal disease for screening initiatives. The conventional visual and tactile exam (CVTE), coupled with a tissue biopsy, remains the gold standard. However, CVTE alone cannot reliably differentiate between reactive/inflammatory and dysplastic lesions. Further, the histologic diagnosis of dysplasia is subjective in nature and a highly imperfect predictor of malignant transformation. This prognostic uncertainty creates a significant clinical management dilemma-watchful waiting with increased patient psychological and economic burdens versus unnecessary aggressive treatment. As such, the development and validation of novel diagnostic platforms such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and prognostic molecular biomarkers may help address these critical unmet clinical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.