Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37184577›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2023

Molecular Catalysis of Energy Relevance in Metal-Organic Frameworks: From Higher Coordination Sphere to System Effects.

Nina F Suremann, Brian D McCarthy, Wanja Gschwind, Amol Kumar, Ben A Johnson, Leif Hammarström, Sascha Ott

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Heterogeneous Indirect Redox Electrocatalysis in Electrolyte.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina F SuremannDepartment of Chemistry - Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 523, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5714-6022
Brian D McCarthyDepartment of Chemistry - Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 523, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2792-1681
Wanja GschwindDepartment of Chemistry - Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 523, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2387-6115
Amol KumarDepartment of Chemistry - Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 523, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2221-7548
Ben A JohnsonDepartment of Chemistry - Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 523, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6570-6392
Leif HammarströmDepartment of Chemistry - Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 523, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9933-9084
Sascha OttDepartment of Chemistry - Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 523, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1691-729X
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modularity and synthetic flexibility of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have provoked analogies with enzymes, and even the term MOFzymes has been coined. In this review, we focus on molecular catalysis of energy relevance in MOFs, more specifically water oxidation, oxygen and carbon dioxide reduction, as well as hydrogen evolution in context of the MOF-enzyme analogy. Similar to enzymes, catalyst encapsulation in MOFs leads to structural stabilization under turnover conditions, while catalyst motifs that are synthetically out of reach in a homogeneous solution phase may be attainable as secondary building units in MOFs. Exploring the unique synthetic possibilities in MOFs, specific groups in the second and third coordination sphere around the catalytic active site have been incorporated to facilitate catalysis. A key difference between enzymes and MOFs is the fact that active site concentrations in the latter are often considerably higher, leading to charge and mass transport limitations in MOFs that are more severe than those in enzymes. High catalyst concentrations also put a limit on the distance between catalysts, and thus the available space for higher coordination sphere engineering. As transport is important for MOF-borne catalysis, a system perspective is chosen to highlight concepts that address the issue. A detailed section on transport and light-driven reactivity sets the stage for a concise review of the currently available literature on utilizing principles from Nature and system design for the preparation of catalytic MOF-based materials.

Identifiers

PMID37184577
PMCPMC10214456
OpenAlexW4376610062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.