ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2023
Reference-Free Plant Disease Detection Using Machine Learning and Long-Read Metagenomic Sequencing.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Integrated Management of Sugar-Beet Soilborne Diseases Through Rhizosphere Microbiome Strategies: A Critical Review of Agronomic Evidence and Application Gaps.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Plant health in the era of global changes, holobiont biology, and microbiome-based solutions.Horticulture research · 2026Article
- Machine-learning-based analysis of host-depletedBioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Genomics in plant pathogen identification and control.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Microbiome-based classification models for fresh produce safety and quality evaluation.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surveillance for early disease detection is crucial to reduce the threat of plant diseases to food security. Metagenomic sequencing and taxonomic classification have recently been used to detect and identify plant pathogens. However, for an emerging pathogen, its genome may not be similar enough to any public genome to permit reference-based tools to identify infected samples. Also, in the case of point-of care diagnosis in the field, database access may be limited. Therefore, here we explore reference-free detection of plant pathogens using metagenomic sequencing and machine learning (ML). We used long-read metagenomes from healthy and infected plants as our model system and constructed k-mer frequency tables to test eight different ML models. The accuracy in classifying individual reads as coming from a healthy or infected metagenome were compared. Of all models, random forest (RF) had the best combination of short run-time and high accuracy (over 0.90) using tomato metagenomes. We further evaluated the RF model with a different tomato sample infected with the same pathogen or a different pathogen and a grapevine sample infected with a grapevine pathogen and achieved similar performances. ML models can thus learn features to successfully perform reference-free detection of plant diseases whereby a model trained with one pathogen-host system can also be used to detect different pathogens on different hosts. Potential and challenges of applying ML to metagenomics in plant disease detection are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.