Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37184112›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2023

Respondent characteristics associated with adherence in a general population ecological momentary assessment study.

Aja Murray, Yi Yang, Xinxin Zhu, Lydia Speyer, Ruth Brown, Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recruitment and retention of adolescents for an ecological momentary assessment measurement burst mental health study: The MHIM engagement strategy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aja MurrayDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9068-3188
Yi YangDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3238-5748
Xinxin ZhuDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lydia SpeyerDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ruth BrownClinical Psychology Department, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Manuel EisnerInstitute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Denis RibeaudJacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 100013_116829Swiss National Science Foundation 100014_132124Swiss National Science Foundation 100014_149979Swiss National Science Foundation 10FI14_170409/1Swiss National Science Foundation 10FI14_170409/2Swiss National Science Foundation 10FI14_198052/1Swiss National Science Foundation 405240-69025Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEcological momentary assessment (EMA) has seen an explosion in popularity in recent years; however, an improved understanding of how to minimise (selective) non-adherence is needed.

methodsWe examined a range of respondent characteristics predictors of adherence (defined as the number of EMA surveys completed) in the D2M EMA study. Participants were a sample of n = 255 individuals drawn from the longitudinal z-proso cohort who completed up to 4 EMA surveys per day for a period of 2 weeks.

resultsIn unadjusted analyses, lower moral shame, lower self-control, lower levels of self-injury, and higher levels of aggression, tobacco use, psychopathy, and delinquency were associated with lower adherence. In fully adjusted analyses with predictors selected using lasso, only alcohol use was related to adherence: beer and alcopops to higher adherence and spirits to lower adherence.

conclusionsThese findings provide potential insights into some of the psychological mechanisms that may underlie adherence in EMA. They also point to respondent characteristics for which additional or tailored efforts may be needed to promote adherence.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentSelf-Injurious BehaviorAlcohol DrinkingHumansResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnairesadherenceecological momentary assessmentexperience samplingmissingnessnon-response

Identifiers

PMID37184112
PMCPMC10698810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.