ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023
Evolution, conservatism and overlooked homologies of the mammalian skull.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age-dependent development of the interincisive suture: a CT-based study on prevalence and dimensions.Anatomical science international · 2026Article
- Diverging selection on body size in specialist terrestrial mammals.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Evolution of accessory bones in cetacean skull coupled with decreasing rate of ossification of cranial sutures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sexual Dimorphism of Foetal Sheep Skulls During the Second and Third Periods of Pregnancy.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- On the Maxillofacial Development of Mice, Mus musculus.Journal of morphology · 2025Article
- Anatomical and Morphological Structure of the Skull of a Juvenile Specimen ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The mammalian skull: development, structure and function.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, studies integrating palaeontology, embryology and experimental developmental biology have markedly altered our homological understanding of the mammalian skull. Indeed, new evidence suggests that we should revisit and restructure the conventional anatomical terminology applied to the components of the mammalian skull. Notably, these are classical problems that have remained unresolved since the ninteenth century. In this review, I offer perspectives on the overlooked problems associated with the homology, development, and conservatism of the mammalian skull, aiming to encourage future studies in these areas. I emphasise that ossification patterns, bone fusion, cranial sutures and taxon-specific neomorphic bones in the skull are virtually unexplored, and further studies would improve our homological understanding of the mammalian skull. Lastly, I highlight that overlooked bones may exist in the skull that are not yet known to science and suggest that further search is needed. This article is part of the theme issue 'The mammalian skull: development, structure and function'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.