Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37183304›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2023

Retracted: Chen, Y, Zhang, W, Kadier, A, Zhang, H, Yao, X. MicroRNA-769-5p suppresses cell growth and migration via targeting NUSAP1 in bladder cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020; 34:e23193.

Abstract readRetraction Notice
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23193. The above article, published online on 03 January 2020 in Wiley Online Library (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal's Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rong Fu, and Wiley Periodicals, LLC. The retraction has been agreed following concerns raised by a third party about image duplication (Figure 3H with Figure 2C from https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103092 and Figure 3C from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.173; Figure 2J with Figure 7D from https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202847; Figures 2G,I and 4C,F, with Figures 2I,J, 3I,J, 5D, 6D and 7F from https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01104, and 5F, 6G, and 7J from https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103762; Figure 5A with Figure 2C from https://doi.org/10.1042/bsr20191330). Upon investigation, the journal determined that the duplicated images were provided by a third party company who performed the experiments on behalf of the authors. The authors were unable to verify the provenance of the images. As a result, the journal no longer has confidence in the results and conclusions drawn and are issuing a retraction.

Identifiers

PMID37183304
PMCPMC10290219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.