Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37183281›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia and pain medicine2023

Computed tomography-guided Gasserian ganglion interventions for cancer-related facial pain in patients with complex anatomy: insights and recommendations.

Ale Ismael González-Casarez, Germán Gerardo Santamaría-Montaño, Ricardo Plancarte-Sánchez, María Rocío Guillén-Núñez, Ángel Manuel Juárez-Lemus, Berenice Carolina Hernández-Porras, Marcela Samano-García, Andrés Rocha-Romero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ale Ismael González-CasarezDepartment of Pain Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Germán Gerardo Santamaría-MontañoDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Hospital General del Estado Dr. Ernesto Ramos Bours, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Ricardo Plancarte-SánchezDepartment of Pain Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
María Rocío Guillén-NúñezDepartment of Pain Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ángel Manuel Juárez-LemusDepartment of Pain Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Berenice Carolina Hernández-PorrasDepartment of Pain Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Marcela Samano-GarcíaDepartment of Pain Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Andrés Rocha-RomeroDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Centro Nacional de Rehabilitación, Hospital de Trauma, San José, Costa Rica.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXHospital Nacional de Niños · CR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Gasserian ganglion is a well-known target for facial pain management, and patients with cancer present an anatomical challenge owing to tumor progression or treatment itself. Computed tomography (CT) is an alternative method for guiding these procedures.

methodsThis was an observational retrospective analysis of patients with cancer-related facial pain who underwent CT-guided Gasserian ganglion interventions using local anesthetics, local anesthetics with steroids, phenol, and radiofrequency. Demographic, clinical, and procedure-related variables were collected from January 1, 2015, to December 30, 2018, at the National Cancer Institute. Data distribution was determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. A paired sample t-test (with a cut-off of P < 0.05 for statistical significance) was used for comparing outcome.

resultsWe observed a significant reduction in numerical rating scale (NRS) and douleur neuropathique 4 (DN4) scores from 7.6 ± 1.4 and 4.4 ± 1.4 to 3.2 ± 2.0 and 2.2 ± 1.4 points, respectively (P < 0.001). After the procedure, 70.8% of the patients were satisfied; 16.7% were very satisfied, and 12.5% were unsatisfied. No intra- or postoperative complications were observed. The most common neoplasms were head and neck tumors (83.3%).

conclusionsOur data suggest that CT guidance is an effective and safe option for managing cancer-related facial pain in patients with complex anatomy, resulting in a significant reduction in pain, high satisfaction rates, and no mechanical complications. Future research should aim to refine the role of CT guidance in multimodal pain management in this population.

Indexed as

Cancer painFacial painGasserian ganglionNeoplasm

Identifiers

PMID37183281
PMCPMC10183620
OpenAlexW4367172193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.