Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37182858›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2023

Martha Rogers' science of unitary human beings in relation to workers health and well-being: A scoping review.

Åsa Hedlund

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Åsa HedlundDepartment of Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorkers' health and well-being are topics on the rise within occupational research. Rogers' science of unitary human beings can potentially contribute to increased knowledge in the area. However, no previous review has investigated how the theory has been used in relation to workers in working life.

objectiveThe aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of studies that have used Rogers' science of unitary human beings to study workers health and well-being in working life.

methodsA literature search was conducted in CINAHL and PubMed, and other relevant sources in May-June 2022.

resultsThe results showed that there seems to be a lack of use of Rogers' science of unitary human beings regarding workers health and well-being in working life. The overarching theme was: Well-being as an essential phenomenon in working life in all dimensions of existing.

conclusionThe theory has potential to contribute more to research regarding workers' health and well-being in working life.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthHealth StatusHumansPsychological Well-BeingNursing researchnursing theoryoccupational groups, occupational health

Identifiers

PMID37182858
PMCPMC10657656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.