Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37182740›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2023

A Scoping Review of Household Factors Contributing to Dietary Quality and Food Security in Low-Income Households with School-Age Children in the United States.

Heather A Eicher-Miller, Lisa Graves, Bethany McGowan, Barbara J Mayfield, Blake A Connolly, Wanda Stevens, Angela Abbott

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather A Eicher-MillerDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: heicherm@purdue.edu.
Lisa GravesDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Bethany McGowanLibraries and School of Information Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Barbara J MayfieldNutrition Communicator, LLC, Delphi, IN, USA.
Blake A ConnollyCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue Extension, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Wanda StevensCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue Extension, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Angela AbbottCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue Extension, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USAptiv (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-income and food-insecure households are at risk of poor dietary quality and even more severe food insecurity. Especially in childhood, consuming a nutritionally adequate diet is an essential driver of health, growth, and development. Household-level factors can present challenges to support the nutritional needs of low-income and food-insecure household members. The aim of this scoping review is to identify the contributing household factors to dietary quality and food security in US households of school-aged children 5 to 19 years and synthesize the evidence around emergent themes for application to future interventions. The scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews using search terms addressing food insecurity, low income, and dietary behaviors in the database PubMed. Screening by 3 independent reviewers of the title, abstract, and full study phases identified 44 studies. The 5 themes around which the studies grouped were: parental behaviors, child/adolescent behaviors, food procurement behaviors, food preparation behaviors, and household environment factors. Most studies were cross-sectional (n = 41, 93%) and focused on parental behaviors (n = 31, 70%), followed by food preparation and procurement behaviors. The themes identified were interrelated and suggest that incorporating education on parent and child behaviors that influence food procurement and preparation, along with strengthening organization and planning in the household environment, may hold promise to improve dietary quality and food security among food-insecure and low-income households. The findings can be used to inform future nutrition education interventions aimed at improving dietary quality and food security in households with school-aged children.

Indexed as

DietFood SupplyAdolescentChildFamily CharacteristicsFood SecurityHumansPovertyUnited Stateschildrendietary behaviordietary qualitydietary selectionfamily meal planningfood insecurityfood purchasingfood securityhouseholdlow-income

Identifiers

PMID37182740
PMCPMC10334140
OpenAlexW4376630366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.