Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37182550›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2023

Temporal, age, and geographical variation in vaccine efficacy against infection by the Delta and Omicron variants in the community in France, December 2021 to March 2022.

François Blanquart, Clémence Abad, Joevin Ambroise, Mathieu Bernard, Florence Débarre, Jean-Marc Giannoli, Thomas Rey, Vincent Vieillefond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Influenza vaccine effectiveness against detected infection in the community, France, October 2024 to February 2025.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

François BlanquartCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology (CIRB), Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, PSL Research University, Paris, France. Electronic address: francois.blanquart@college-de-france.fr.
Clémence AbadLBM BIOESTEREL-Biogroup-Plateau technique de Mouans-Sartoux, Mouans-Sartoux, France.
Joevin AmbroiseBPO-BIOEPINE-Biogroup-Plateau technique Chocolaterie, Levallois-Perret, France.
Mathieu BernardBIOESTEREL - Biogroup - Plateau technique la Bastide, Sanary sur Mer, France.
Florence DébarreInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris (iEES-Paris, UMR 7618), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, UPEC, IRD, INRAE, Paris, France.
Jean-Marc GiannoliBiogroup - Direction technique, Lyon, France.
Thomas ReyLBM BIOESTEREL-Biogroup-Plateau technique de Mouans-Sartoux, Mouans-Sartoux, France.
Vincent VieillefondBPO-BIOEPINE-Biogroup-Plateau technique Chocolaterie, Levallois-Perret, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to quantify how the vaccine efficacy of BNT162b2, messenger RNA-1273, AD26.COV2-S, and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 against detected infection by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants varied by time since the last dose, vaccine scheme, age, and geographic areas.

methodsWe analyzed 3,261,749 community polymerase chain reaction tests conducted by private laboratories in France from December 2021 to March 2022 with a test-negative design comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals.

resultsEfficacy against detected infection by Delta was 89% (95% confidence interval, 86-91%) at 2 weeks, down to 59% (56-61%) at 26 weeks and more after the second dose. Efficacy against Omicron was 48% (45-51%) at 2 weeks, down to 4% (2-5%) at 16 weeks after the second dose. A third dose temporarily restored efficacy. Efficacy against Omicron was lower in children and the elderly. Geographical variability in efficacy may reflect variability in the ratio of the number of contacts of vaccinated vs unvaccinated individuals. This ratio ranged from 0 to +50% across departments and correlated with the number of restaurants and bars per inhabitant (beta = 15.0 [0.75-29], P-value = 0.04), places that only vaccinated individuals could access in the study period.

conclusionSARS-CoV-2 vaccines conferred low and transient protection against Omicron infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19Vaccine EfficacyAgedBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19ChildCOVID-19 VaccinesFranceHumansSARS-CoV-2BNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesBehaviorSARS-CoV-2Vaccine efficacyVariants of concern

Identifiers

PMID37182550
PMCPMC10176971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.