Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37182529›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Public health2023

Effect of HPV self-collection kits on cervical cancer screening uptake among under-screened women from low-income US backgrounds (MBMT-3): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Peyton K Pretsch, Lisa P Spees, Noel T Brewer, Michael G Hudgens, Busola Sanusi, Eliane Rohner, Elyse Miller, Sarah L Jackson, Lynn Barclay, Alicia Carter and 2 more

Erratum issued 3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02651883 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of HPV Self-Collection on Cervical Cancer Screening in High Risk Women: My Body, My Test 3

TypeinterventionalSponsorUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2016 to 2020Enrolled665ConditionsCervical Cancer, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Human PapillomavirusArmsScreening invitation (with education), Self-collection for HPV testing
NCT06656611 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

PAPMOBILE: Mobile Outreach Screening of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Women with Limited Access to Health Services in Seine-Saint-Denis (greater Paris Area, France)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'BaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled700ConditionsWomen's Health: Cervical NeoplasmArmsHPV self sampling
NCT07214506 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Options to Promote Equity (HOPE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsUterine Cervical Neoplasms, HPV Testing, Pap SmearArmsHuman papillomavirus Self-collection, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. A Mail-Based HPV Self-Collection Program to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening in Appalachia: Results of a Group Randomized Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Racial Differences in Expected Versus Actual Costs of Cervical Cancer Screening among Low-Income, Underscreened Women in North Carolina.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peyton K PretschDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lisa P SpeesDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Noel T BrewerDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Michael G HudgensDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Busola SanusiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Eliane RohnerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Elyse MillerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sarah L JacksonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lynn BarclayAmerican Sexual Health Association, Durham, NC, USA.
Alicia CarterLaboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, USA.
Stephanie B WheelerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer S SmithDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: jennifers@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAmerican Sexual Health Association · USLabCorp (United States) · US

Funding

Observational Antiretroviral Studies In Southern Africa (OASIS) CollaborationU01AI069924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITAT BERN · PI Cleophas Chimbetete, Mary-Ann Davies · 2006 to 2026
$55.9M
Effect of HPV Self-Collection on Cervical Cancer Screening in High Risk WomenR01CA183891 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, JENNIFER SUSAN · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183891NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost cervical cancer in the USA occurs in under-screened women. The My Body, My Test-3 (MBMT-3) trial sought to assess the efficacy of mailed human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection kits with appointment-scheduling assistance to increase uptake of cervical cancer screening among under-screened women from low-income backgrounds compared with scheduling assistance alone.

methodsMBMT-3 is a phase 3, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. Participants were recruited from 22 counties in North Carolina state, USA, and we partnered with 21 clinics across these counties. Participants were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 25-64 years, had an intact cervix, were uninsured or enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare, had an income of 250% or less of the US Federal Poverty Level, were living within the catchment area of a trial-associated clinic, and were overdue for screening (ie, Papanicolaou test ≥4 years ago or high-risk HPV test ≥6 years ago). Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive a mailed HPV self-collection kit and assistance for scheduling a free screening appointment (intervention group) or to receive scheduling assistance alone (control group). Randomisation was conducted by county using permuted blocks of nine patients and assignment to group was not masked. Participants in the intervention group were mailed HPV self-collection kits to collect a cervical-vaginal sample and return it by mail for testing. Samples were tested with the Aptima HPV assay (Hologic, San Diego, CA, USA), and participants were informed of high-risk HPV results by telephone call. Trial staff made up to three telephone call attempts to provide scheduling assistance for in-clinic screening for all participants. The primary outcome was cervical cancer screening uptake (ie, attending an in-clinic screening appointment or testing negative for high-risk HPV with a returned self-collected sample) within 6 months of enrolment in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02651883, and has been completed.

findingsRecruitment occurred between April 11, 2016, and Dec 16, 2019. 4256 women contacted the trial to participate, of whom 899 (21%) were eligible for inclusion and 697 (78%) returned consent forms. Of those who consented, 461 (66%) women were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 236 (34%) women were randomly assigned to the control group. We excluded 32 ineligible women post-randomisation, leaving 665 for primary analysis. Screening uptake was higher in the intervention group (317 [72%] of 438) than control group (85 [37%] of 227; risk ratio 1·93, 95% CI 1·62-2·31). Among intervention participants, 341 (78%) of 438 returned a self-collection kit. Three participants reported hurt or injury when using the self-collection kit; no participants withdrew due to adverse effects.

interpretationAmong under-screened women from low-income backgrounds, mailed HPV self-collection kits with scheduling assistance led to greater uptake of cervical cancer screening than scheduling assistance alone. At-home HPV self-collection testing has the potential to increase screening uptake among under-screened women.

fundingNational Cancer Institute.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMedicarePovertyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37182529
PMCPMC10283467
OpenAlexW4376126465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.