Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37182478›Full record

ArticleMidwifery2023

Which low- and middle-income countries have midwife-led birthing centres and what are the main characteristics of these centres? A scoping review and scoping survey.

Andrea Nove, Oliva Bazirete, Kirsty Hughes, Sabera Turkmani, Emily Callander, Vanessa Scarf, Mandy Forrester, Shree Mandke, Sally Pairman, Caroline Se Homer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Midwifery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea NoveNovametrics Ltd, Duffield, Derbyshire, UK. Electronic address: andrea@novametrics.org.
Oliva BazireteNovametrics Ltd, Duffield, Derbyshire, UK; University of Rwanda School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kigali, Rwanda.
Kirsty HughesNovametrics Ltd, Duffield, Derbyshire, UK.
Sabera TurkmaniBurnet Institute Global Women's and Newborn Health Group, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Emily CallanderMonash University Health Systems Services & Policy Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Vanessa ScarfUniversity of Technology Sydney School of Nursing and Midwifery, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mandy ForresterInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Shree MandkeInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Sally PairmanInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Caroline Se HomerBurnet Institute Global Women's and Newborn Health Group, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; University of Technology Sydney School of Nursing and Midwifery, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence about the safety and benefits of midwife-led care during childbirth has led to midwife-led settings being recommended for women with uncomplicated pregnancies. However, most of the research on this topic comes from high-income countries. Relatively little is known about the availability and characteristics of midwife-led birthing centres in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aimed to identify which LMICs have midwife-led birthing centres, and their main characteristics. The study was conducted in two parts: a scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, and a scoping survey of professional midwives' associations and United Nations Population Fund country offices. We used nine academic databases and the Google search engine, to locate literature describing birthing centres in LMICs in which midwives or nurse-midwives were the lead care providers. The review included 101 items published between January 2012 and February 2022. The survey consisted of a structured online questionnaire, and responses were received from 77 of the world's 137 low- and middle-income countries. We found at least one piece of evidence indicating that midwife-led birthing centres existed in 57 low- and middle-income countries. The evidence was relatively strong for 24 of these countries, i.e. there was evidence from at least two of the three types of source (peer-reviewed literature, grey literature, and survey). Only 14 of them featured in the peer-reviewed literature. Low- and lower-middle-income countries were more likely than upper-middle-income countries to have midwife-led birthing centres. The most common type of midwife-led birthing centre was freestanding. Public-sector midwife-led birthing centres were more common in middle-income than in low-income countries. Some were staffed entirely by midwives and some by a multidisciplinary team. We identified challenges to the midwifery philosophy of care and to effective referral systems. The peer-reviewed literature does not provide a comprehensive picture of the locations and characteristics of midwife-led birthing centres in low- and middle-income countries. Many of our findings echo those from high-income countries, but some appear to be specific to some or all low- and middle-income countries. The study highlights knowledge gaps, including a lack of evidence about the impact and costs of midwife-led birthing centres in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Birthing CentersMidwiferyDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesChildbirthMidwife-ledMidwiferyModel of care

Identifiers

PMID37182478
PMCPMC10281083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.