Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37182056›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Impact of Pathologic Complete Response on the Prognosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Cohort Study.

Rafael Everton Assunção Ribeiro da Costa, Fergus Tomás Rocha de Oliveira, Ana Lúcia Nascimento Araújo, Sabas Carlos Vieira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. NCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafael Everton Assunção Ribeiro da CostaHealth Science Center, State University of Piauí, Teresina, BRA.
Fergus Tomás Rocha de OliveiraHealth Science Center, State University of Piauí, Teresina, BRA.
Ana Lúcia Nascimento AraújoTocogynecology, Oncocenter, Teresina, BRA.
Sabas Carlos VieiraTocogynecology, Oncocenter, Teresina, BRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a molecular subtype in which estrogen (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) expression does not occur. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Methods This cohort study was conducted in a private-sector oncology clinic located in the city of Teresina, Brazil. Medical charts of 532 breast cancer patients treated from 2007 to 2020 were analyzed. Of these patients, 83 women with TNBC were selected (10 patients were excluded from the study). Univariate and multivariate analyses (Cox regression) were performed to evaluate the impact on patient survival, comparing patients with or without pCR. A significance level of 5% was set. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier model. Results Angiolymphatic invasion and positive sentinel lymph node were associated with a lower OS and/or DFS in TNBC (p<0.05). The 10-year OS was 78% and 49%, and the 10-year DFS was 97% and 32% in patients with or without pCR, respectively. Conclusion pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improvement in OS and DFS in TNBC patients.

Indexed as

hr-/pr-/her2- breast cancerneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapypathologic complete responseprognosissurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID37182056
PMCPMC10171840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.