ArticleCureus2023
Phenotype and Genotype of Saudi Pediatric Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Seven-Year Multicenter Experience From Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of neuropsychiatric and seizure disorders in neurofibromatosis type 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical characteristics and healthcare burden of neurofibromatosis type 1 in Saudi Arabia: a single centre experience.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Seizures and Course of Epilepsy in Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1-A Tertiary Center Experience in a Cohort of 118 Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diagnosis and management of neurofibromatosis type 1 in Arabian Gulf Cooperation Council Region: challenges and recommendations.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a complex disorder. Genetics and environment might be attributed as the leading cause of NF1, which is characterized by multisystemic involvement. We aim to elaborate on Saudi children's NF1 phenotypes and genotypes. Methods This study was conducted in the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA), Saudi Arabia including three tertiary hospitals, using a retrospective cohort method. Electronic charts were reviewed to extract the variables. All Saudi pediatric patients aged less than 18 with NF1 were included. Consecutive sampling was used due to the limited number of patients. Results The study included 160 patients (81 males) with an average age of 8.08 years. Also, 33 (20.6%) patients had cutaneous neurofibroma while 31 (19.4%) patients had plexiform neurofibromas. Iris lisch nodules were seen in 33.75%. Optic pathway glioma was seen in 29 (18%) cases while non-optic pathway glioma was seen in 27 (17%) cases. Skeletal abnormalities were seen in 27 (17%) of cases. A first-degree relative with NF1 was seen in 83 (52%) of cases. Epilepsy was the presenting feature of 27 (17%) cases. Cognitive impairment was found in 15 (9.4%) patients. Genetic mutation was seen in 82/100 cases, the rest were negative. The types of mutations were as follows: nonsense 30 (36.6%); missense 20 (24.4%); splicing site mutation 12 (14.6%); frameshift 10 (12.2%); microdeletion 7 (8.5%); and whole gene deletion 3 (3.75%) patients. No phenotype-genotype correlation was seen. Conclusion In this cohort of Saudi pediatric patients with NF1, optic pathway glioma and other brain tumors were prevalent. The most common mutation is the nonsense mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.