ReviewCureus2023
The Usefulness of Bioelectrical Impedance as a Marker of Fluid Status in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetic Alterations in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Wearable Devices Based on Bioimpedance Test in Heart Failure: Clinical Relevance: Systematic Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and How it Correlates to Intracardiac Hemodynamics in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Bioelectrical impedance analysis and physical function improved risk prediction for cardiac dysfunction in hemodialysis patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Safety of bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A systematic review.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Potential of ECW/ICW and ECW/TBW as Early and Sensitive Indicators of Chronic Heart Failure Status and Medication Adherence in a Patient With Dementia: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Bioimpedance analysis predicts worsening events in outpatients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2024Observational
- Extracellular fluid volume as a key indicator in home-care management of chronic heart failure: The role of nutritional and exercise therapy.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a method that measures electrical currents conducted through water, which assesses fluid status by measuring extracellular water (ECW), total body water (TBW), and resistance (R). Limited studies are done to evaluate the utility of BIA in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), and therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate this. A comprehensive literature search was performed at Medline and Embase until March 2022. Our primary outcome was a comparison of TBW and ECW between patients with CHF and controls. Our secondary outcome was to compare R between the groups. All analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Six studies with 1,046 patients met our inclusion criteria. Out of 1,046 patients, 526 had CHF and 538 had no CHF. Among patients with CHF, all 526 had decompensated CHF. There was no significant difference in TBW between patients with heart failure and the control group (mean deviation (MD) = 1.42 (-0.44-3.27), percent of variation (I2) = 0%, p = 0.13). ECW was significantly higher with an assessment of BIA in heart failure patients compared to patients in the control group (MD = 1.62 (0.82-2.42), I2 = 0%, p < 0.0001). Resistance of extracellular fluid was significantly lower in the heart failure group (MD = -45.64 (-72.88--18.41), I2 = 83%, p = 0.001). Publication bias was deferred as the number of included studies was less than 10. BIA can be helpful in ambulatory and inpatient setting to identify patients' fluid status, which can improve outcomes. However, larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the usefulness of BIA in the CHF population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.