Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37181835›Full record

ReviewSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2022

Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Based on the Data of Various Modalities: Biomarkers and Machine Learning Techniques (Review).

M G Sharaev, I K Malashenkova, A V Maslennikova, N V Zakharova, A V Bernstein, E V Burnaev, G S Mamedova, S A Krynskiy, D P Ogurtsov, E A Kondrateva and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M G SharaevSenior Researcher; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Territory of Skolkovo Innovation Center, Bldg 1, 30 Bolshoy Boulevard, Moscow, 121205, Russia; Department Senior Researcher; N.A. Alekseyev Psychiatric Clinical Hospital No.1, 2 Zagorodnoye Shosse, Moscow, 117152, Russia.
I K MalashenkovaHead of the Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Virology; National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 1 Akademika Kurchatova Square, Moscow, 123182, Russia; Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology; Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, 1A Malaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow, 119435, Russia.
A V MaslennikovaResearcher, Laboratory of Human Higher Nervous Activity; Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5A Butlerova St., Moscow, 117485, Russia.
N V ZakharovaHead of the Laboratory for Fundamental Research Methods, Research Clinical Center of Neuropsychiatry; N.A. Alekseyev Psychiatric Clinical Hospital No.1, 2 Zagorodnoye Shosse, Moscow, 117152, Russia.
A V BernsteinProfessor, Professor of the Center of Applied Artificial Intelligence; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Territory of Skolkovo Innovation Center, Bldg 1, 30 Bolshoy Boulevard, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
E V BurnaevAssociate Professor, Professor of the Center of Applied Artificial Intelligence; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Territory of Skolkovo Innovation Center, Bldg 1, 30 Bolshoy Boulevard, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
G S MamedovaJunior Researcher, Laboratory for Fundamental Research Methods, Research Clinical Center of Neuropsychiatry; N.A. Alekseyev Psychiatric Clinical Hospital No.1, 2 Zagorodnoye Shosse, Moscow, 117152, Russia.
S A KrynskiyResearcher, Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Virology; National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 1 Akademika Kurchatova Square, Moscow, 123182, Russia.
D P OgurtsovResearcher, Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Virology; National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 1 Akademika Kurchatova Square, Moscow, 123182, Russia.
E A KondratevaPhD Student; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Territory of Skolkovo Innovation Center, Bldg 1, 30 Bolshoy Boulevard, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
P V DruzhininaPhD Student; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Territory of Skolkovo Innovation Center, Bldg 1, 30 Bolshoy Boulevard, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
M O ZubrikhinaPhD Student; Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Territory of Skolkovo Innovation Center, Bldg 1, 30 Bolshoy Boulevard, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
A Yu ArkhipovResearcher, Laboratory of Human Higher Nervous Activity; Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5A Butlerova St., Moscow, 117485, Russia.
V B StreletsChief Researcher, Laboratory of Human Higher Nervous Activity; Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5A Butlerova St., Moscow, 117485, Russia.
V L UshakovAssociate Professor, Chief Researcher, Institute for Advanced Brain Research; Lomonosov Moscow State University, 27/1 Lomonosov Avenue, Moscow, 119192, Russia; Head of the Department; N.A. Alekseyev Psychiatric Clinical Hospital No.1, 2 Zagorodnoye Shosse, Moscow, 117152, Russia; Senior Researcher; National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 31 Kashirskoye Shosse, Moscow, 115409, Russia.
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a socially significant mental disorder resulting frequently in severe forms of disability. Diagnosis, choice of treatment tactics, and rehabilitation in clinical psychiatry are mainly based on the assessment of behavioral patterns, socio-demographic data, and other investigations such as clinical observations and neuropsychological testing including examination of patients by the psychiatrist, self-reports, and questionnaires. In many respects, these data are subjective and therefore a large number of works have appeared in recent years devoted to the search for objective characteristics (indices, biomarkers) of the processes going on in the human body and reflected in the behavioral and psychoneurological patterns of patients. Such biomarkers are based on the results of instrumental and laboratory studies (neuroimaging, electro-physiological, biochemical, immunological, genetic, and others) and are successfully being used in neurosciences for understanding the mechanisms of the emergence and development of nervous system pathologies. Presently, with the advent of new effective neuroimaging, laboratory, and other methods of investigation and also with the development of modern methods of data analysis, machine learning, and artificial intelligence, a great number of scientific and clinical studies is being conducted devoted to the search for the markers which have diagnostic and prognostic value and may be used in clinical practice to objectivize the processes of establishing and clarifying the diagnosis, choosing and optimizing treatment and rehabilitation tactics, predicting the course and outcome of the disease. This review presents the analysis of the works which describe the correlates between the diagnosis of schizophrenia, established by health professionals, various manifestations of the psychiatric disorder (its subtype, variant of the course, severity degree, observed symptoms, etc.), and objectively measured characteristics/quantitative indicators (anatomical, functional, immunological, genetic, and others) obtained during instrumental and laboratory examinations of patients. A considerable part of these works has been devoted to correlates/biomarkers of schizophrenia based on the data of structural and functional (at rest and under cognitive load) MRI, EEG, tractography, and immunological data. The found correlates/biomarkers reflect anatomic disorders in the specific brain regions, impairment of functional activity of brain regions and their interconnections, specific microstructure of the brain white matter and the levels of connectivity between the tracts of various structures, alterations of electrical activity in various parts of the brain in different EEG spectral ranges, as well as changes in the innate and adaptive links of immunity. Current methods of data analysis and machine learning to search for schizophrenia biomarkers using the data of diverse modalities and their application during building and interpretation of predictive diagnostic models of schizophrenia have been considered in the present review.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersBrainHumansMachine LearningBiomarkersbiomarkers of schizophreniaEEG in schizophreniaimmunology in schizophreniainterpretable machine learning modelsmachine learning in diagnosingMRI/fMRI in schizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID37181835
PMCPMC10171060
OpenAlexW4307687253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.