Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37181799›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

Epigenetic opportunities for evolutionary computation.

Sizhe Yuen, Thomas H G Ezard, Adam J Sobey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sizhe YuenMaritime Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5552-2074
Thomas H G EzardOcean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, European Way, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK.
Adam J SobeyMaritime Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary computation is a group of biologically inspired algorithms used to solve complex optimization problems. It can be split into evolutionary algorithms, which take inspiration from genetic inheritance, and swarm intelligence algorithms, that take inspiration from cultural inheritance. However, much of the modern evolutionary literature remains relatively unexplored. To understand which evolutionary mechanisms have been considered, and which have been overlooked, this paper breaks down successful bioinspired algorithms under a contemporary biological framework based on the extended evolutionary synthesis, an extension of the classical, genetics focused, modern synthesis. Although the idea of the extended evolutionary synthesis has not been fully accepted in evolutionary theory, it presents many interesting concepts that could provide benefits to evolutionary computation. The analysis shows that Darwinism and the modern synthesis have been incorporated into evolutionary computation but the extended evolutionary synthesis has been broadly ignored beyond: cultural inheritance, incorporated in the sub-set of swarm intelligence algorithms, evolvability, through covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES), and multilevel selection, through multilevel selection genetic algorithm (MLSGA). The framework shows a gap in epigenetic inheritance for evolutionary computation, despite being a key building block in modern interpretations of evolution. This leaves a diverse range of biologically inspired mechanisms as low hanging fruit that should be explored further within evolutionary computation and illustrates the potential of epigenetic based approaches through the recent benchmarks in the literature.

Indexed as

epigeneticsevolutionary algorithmsevolutionary biologyevolutionary computationnon-genetic inheritanceswarm intelligence

Identifiers

PMID37181799
PMCPMC10170609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.