Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37181587›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2023

The influence of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol adherence in patients undergoing elective neuro-oncological craniotomies.

Anukoon Kaewborisutsakul, Chanatthee Kitsiripant, Sukanya Kaewsridam, Wilairat Kankuan Kaewborisutsakul, Chaitong Churuangsuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. ERAS Protocol Elements and Neurosurgery-Specific Considerations: A Narrative Review.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anukoon KaewborisutsakulNeurological Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Chanatthee KitsiripantDivision of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Sukanya KaewsridamDivision of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Wilairat Kankuan KaewborisutsakulAnatomy Program, Faculty of Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Chaitong ChuruangsukDivision of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have reduced the length of hospital stay (LOS) and healthcare costs without increasing adverse outcomes. We describe the impact of adherence to an ERAS protocol for elective craniotomy among neuro-oncology patients at a single institution. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled adult patients who underwent elective craniotomy and the ERAS protocol at our institute between January 2020 and April 2021. The patients were divided into high- and low-adherence groups depending on their adherence to ≥9 or <9 of the 16 items, respectively. Inferential statistics were used to compare group outcomes, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors related to delayed discharge (LOS>7 days). Results: Among the 100 patients assessed, median adherence was 8 items (range, 4-16), and 55 and 45 patients were classified into the high- and low-adherence groups, respectively. Age, sex, comorbidities, brain pathology, and operative profiles were comparable at baseline. The high-adherence group showed significantly better outcomes, including shorter median LOS (8 days vs. 11 days; p ​= ​0.002) and lower median hospital costs (131,657.5 baht vs. 152,974 baht; p ​= ​0.005). The groups showed no differences in 30-day postoperative complications or Karnofsky performance status. In the multivariable analysis, high adherence to the ERAS protocol (>50%) was the only significant factor preventing delayed discharge (OR ​= ​0.28; 95% CI ​= ​0.10 to 0.78; p ​= ​0.04). Conclusions: High adherence to ERAS protocols showed a strong association with short hospital stays and cost reductions. Our ERAS protocol was feasible and safe for patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors.

Indexed as

AdherenceBrain tumorComplianceElective craniotomyEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)

Identifiers

PMID37181587
PMCPMC10173293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.