Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37181584›Full record

ReviewWorld neurosurgery: X2023

Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle-based therapy for nerve injury: A review of the molecular mechanisms.

Davood Nasiry, Ali Reza Khalatbary

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World neurosurgery: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Repair mechanisms of the central nervous system: From axon sprouting to remyelination.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Research progress on the mechanism of exosome-mediated virus infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Davood NasiryAmol Faculty of Paramedicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Ali Reza KhalatbaryCellular and Molecular Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that stem cell therapy has beneficial effects on nerve damage. These beneficial effects were subsequently found to be exerted in part in a paracrine manner by the release of extracellular vesicles. Stem cell-secreted extracellular vesicles have shown great potential to reduce inflammation and apoptosis, optimize the function of Schwann cells, regulate genes related to regeneration, and improve behavioral performance after nerve damage. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the effect of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles on neuroprotection and regeneration along with their molecular mechanisms after nerve damage.

Indexed as

Clinical trialExtracellular vesicleIn vitroIn vivoNerve injuryStem cell

Identifiers

PMID37181584
PMCPMC10173266
OpenAlexW4366814009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.