ArticleJournal of blood disorders & transfusion2022
Computer-Assisted Aneurysm Growth Evaluation and Detection (AGED): Comparison with Clinical Aneurysm Follow-Up.
Article in Journal of blood disorders & transfusion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aneurysm growth evaluation and detection: a computer-assisted follow-up MRA analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Since growing intracranial aneurysms (IA) are more likely to rupture, detecting growth is an important part of unruptured IA follow-up. Recent studies have consistently shown that detecting IA growth can be challenging, especially in smaller aneurysms. In this study, we present an automated computational method to assist detecting aneurysm growth. Materials and Methods: An analysis program, Aneurysm Growth Evaluation & Detection (AGED) based on IA images was developed. To verify the program can satisfactorily detect clinical aneurysm growth, we performed this comparative study using clinical determinations of growth during IA follow-up as a gold standard. Patients with unruptured, saccular IA followed by diagnostic brain CTA to monitor IA progression were reviewed. 48 IA image series from twenty longitudinally-followed ICA IA were analyzed using AGED. A set of IA morphologic features were calculated. Nonparametric statistical tests and ROC analysis were performed to evaluate the performance of each feature for growth detection. Results: The set of automatically calculated morphologic features demonstrated comparable results to standard, manual clinical IA growth evaluation. Specifically, automatically calculated HMAX was superior (AUC = 0.958) at distinguishing growing and stable IA, followed by V, and SA (AUC = 0.927 and 0.917, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings support automatic methods of detecting IA growth from sequential imaging studies as a useful adjunct to standard clinical assessment. AGED-generated growth detection shows promise for characterization and detection of IA growth and time-saving comparing with manual measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37181479PMC10174624W4376642498What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.