Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37181417›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2023

The test-retest reliability of large and small fiber nerve excitability testing with threshold tracking.

Hossein Pia, Zahra Nochi, Alexander Gramm Kristensen, Bernhard Pelz, Marcus Goetz, Jan-Niclas Hoeink, Anthony James Blockeel, André Mouraux, Andrea Truini, Nanna Brix Finnerup and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hossein PiaDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Zahra NochiDanish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Alexander Gramm KristensenDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Bernhard PelzMRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcus GoetzMRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan-Niclas HoeinkMRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anthony James BlockeelSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
André MourauxInstitute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Andrea TruiniDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Nanna Brix FinnerupDanish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Keith Geoffrey PhillipsEli Lilly and Company, CIC Cambridge, MA, United States.
Rolf-Detlef TreedeNeurophysiology Department, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Hatice TankisiDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Standard nerve excitability testing (NET) predominantly assesses Aα- and Aβ-fiber function, but a method examining small afferents would be of great interest in pain studies. Here, we examined the properties of a novel perception threshold tracking (PTT) method that preferentially activates Aδ-fibers using weak currents delivered by a novel multipin electrode and compared its reliability with NET. Methods: Eighteen healthy subjects (mean age:34.06 ± 2.0) were examined three times with motor and sensory NET and PTT in morning and afternoon sessions on the same day (intra-day reliability) and after a week (inter-day reliability). NET was performed on the median nerve, while PTT stimuli were delivered through a multipin electrode located on the forearm. During PTT, subjects indicated stimulus perception via a button press and the intensity of the current was automatically increased or decreased accordingly by Qtrac software. This allowed changes in the perception threshold to be tracked during strength-duration time constant (SDTC) and threshold electrotonus protocols. Results: The coefficient of variation (CoV) and interclass coefficient of variation (ICC) showed good-excellent reliability for most NET parameters. PTT showed poor reliability for both SDTC and threshold electrotonus parameters. There was a significant correlation between large (sensory NET) and small (PTT) fiber SDTC when all sessions were pooled (r = 0.29, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Threshold tracking technique can be applied directly to small fibers via a psychophysical readout, but with the current technique, the reliability is poor. Significance: Further studies are needed to examine whether Aβ-fiber SDTC may be a surrogate biomarker for peripheral nociceptive signalling.

Indexed as

Motor nerve excitability testingPain biomarkerPerception threshold trackingSensory nerve excitability testingTest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID37181417
PMCPMC10172996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.