ReviewHGG advances2023
Cloud-based biomedical data storage and analysis for genomic research: Landscape analysis of data governance in emerging NIH-supported platforms.
Review in HGG advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eras of bioinformatics technologies from command-line interfaces to artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Characterizing core outcomes of responsible stewardship for human genomic data in the cloud.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Unleashing potential: assessing Africa's readiness for the data science revolution to impact health.Nature communications · 2026Review
- A maturity model framework for federated networks of trusted research environments.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Insights into the Datasets, Tools, and Training Needs of the AnVIL Community: 2024.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Data sharing in the PRIMED Consortium: Design, implementation, and recommendations for future policymaking.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Ethical governance for genomic data science in the cloud.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Article
- Current landscape of cancer genomics research in sub-Saharan Africa - a review of literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- NIGMS Sandbox: a learning platform toward democratizing cloud computing for biomedical research.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The storage, sharing, and analysis of genomic data poses technical and logistical challenges that have precipitated the development of cloud-based computing platforms designed to facilitate collaboration and maximize the scientific utility of data. To understand cloud platforms' policies and procedures and the implications for different stakeholder groups, in summer 2021, we reviewed publicly available documents (N = 94) sourced from platform websites, scientific literature, and lay media for five NIH-funded cloud platforms (the All of Us Research Hub, NHGRI AnVIL, NHLBI BioData Catalyst, NCI Genomic Data Commons, and the Kids First Data Resource Center) and a pre-existing data sharing mechanism, dbGaP. Platform policies were compared across seven categories of data governance: data submission, data ingestion, user authentication and authorization, data security, data access, auditing, and sanctions. Our analysis finds similarities across the platforms, including reliance on a formal data ingestion process, multiple tiers of data access with varying user authentication and/or authorization requirements, platform and user data security measures, and auditing for inappropriate data use. Platforms differ in how data tiers are organized, as well as the specifics of user authentication and authorization across access tiers. Our analysis maps elements of data governance across emerging NIH-funded cloud platforms and as such provides a key resource for stakeholders seeking to understand and utilize data access and analysis options across platforms and to surface aspects of governance that may require harmonization to achieve the desired interoperability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.